IUCN threat status:

Critically Endangered (CR)


Read full entry

Archey's frog

Archey's frog, Leiopelma archeyi, is an archaic, rare frog native to New Zealand, one of only three (or four) extant species belonging to the taxonomic family Leiopelmatidae. It is named after Sir Gilbert Archey (1890–1974), the former Director of the Auckland Institute.[2] It is found only in the Coromandel Peninsula and near Te Kuiti in the North Island of New Zealand. This species, along with others in the family, have changed little over the past 200 million years, and thus represent "living fossils".

The species is fully terrestrial, living and reproducing under damp vegetation in native forests. Currently, its distribution is confined to higher elevations at just two localities, although just 15 years ago, the species was abundant in a much wider distribution, down to sea level. Little is known about the natural history of this species. Although the species is sexually monomorphic, males are believed to be the primary care providers, and may prepare "nests" they guard for the eggs, secreting antimicrobial peptides onto them, to ensure successful embryonic development. Clutch sizes vary between four and 15 eggs. Reproduction is fully terrestrial; tadpoles develop within gelatinous egg capsules, and upon hatching, tailed froglets crawl onto the male's back and are carried around for several weeks where they complete metamorphosis. Adult frogs do not give advertisement vocalisations, but may communicate by chemical signalling. However, frogs sometimes give startle calls when threatened by a predator.

An intensively monitored population in one Cormandel site declined by 88% from 1996 to 2001,[3] but in many areas where frogs previously were common, none remain. Because populations are rapidly declining, and reproduction is infrequent, the species is at significant risk of imminent extinction.

As first shown by Bruce Waldman,[4] the species appears to have an intrinsically low level of susceptibility to chytridiomycosis.[5] However, frogs in the field show clinical signs, including blisters, that may be associated with other diseases.[6] Nonetheless, despite field observations suggesting that frogs were dying from other causes, New Zealand researchers continued to argue that the species was most at risk from chytridiomycosis and planned their management strategies primarily to mitigate threats from this disease.[7] After his research permits were withdrawn by the Department of Conservation,[8] Waldman subsequently left New Zealand.[9]

A captive breeding programme was established at the University of Canterbury in 2002 to safeguard the species from disease,[10] and frogs successfully bred.[11] The programme was transferred to Auckland Zoo in 2005, where over half of the frogs, including juveniles bred at the Canterbury facility, died.[12] Some of the remaining frogs produced offspring in December 2012, of which seven still survived as of February, 2013.[13] After 8 years of failed attempts to get the frogs to breed at Auckland Zoo, zookeepers claimed "a massive and internationally important victory".[14] Based on an Auckland Zoo press release that promoted their new public display of adult Archey's frogs,[15] the Auckland Zoo breeding was widely but inaccurately reported as representing the first time the frogs had successfully reproduced in captivity. Auckland Zoo, Otago University, and James Cook University researchers attribute the mortality and reproductive failures at Auckland Zoo in part to metabolic bone disease, which they determined had not been a problem in the Canterbury facility.[16]

The species is categorised as Nationally Critical in the New Zealand Threat Classification System[17] and as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Bell (2004). Leiopelma archeyi. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. www.iucnredlist.org. Retrieved on 11 May 2006.
  2. ^ "Leiopelma archeyi: Archey's Frog". AmphibiaWeb. Retrieved 13 June 2006. 
  3. ^ Bell BD, Carver S, Mitchell NJ, Pledger S (2004) The recent decline of a New Zealand endemic: How and why did populations of Archey’s frog Leiopelma archeyi crash over 1996–2001? Biol Conserv 120:189–199.
  4. ^ Pesticides blamed for killing our rarest frogs. Sunday Star Times, 1 May 2005.
  5. ^ Elimination of the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis by Archey’s frog Leiopelma archeyi. Aquatic Diseases of Organisms, 84: 9–15, 2009 doi:10.3354/dao02028.
  6. ^ Waldman B (2011) Brief encounters with Archey's frog. FrogLog 99:39-41
  7. ^ http://www.edgeofexistence.org/amphibians/species_info.php?id=546
  8. ^ http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/22/my-personal-story-revealed/
  9. ^ http://www.useoul.edu/news/news0101_view.jsp?idx=128918
  10. ^ Frog mission underway Independent Radio News, 31 July 2002.
  11. ^ Waldman B (2011) Brief encounters with Archey's Frog. FrogLog 99:39-41
  12. ^ Gibson, Eloise (28 March 2009). "Half of zoo frog colony dies". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 16 September 2011. .
  13. ^ Vaimoana Tapaleao (Feb 27, 2013). "Rare frogs thriving at zoo". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved Feb 27, 2013. 
  14. ^ "Rare NZ native frog breeds at Auckland Zoo". Fairfax Newspapers. Feb 27, 2013. Retrieved Feb 27, 2013. 
  15. ^ "Big leap forward in breeding of rare frog". Auckland Zoo. Feb 27, 2013. Retrieved Feb 27, 2013. 
  16. ^ Shaw SD, Bishop PJ, Harvey C, Berger L, Skerratt LF, Callon K, Watson M, Potter J, Jakob-Hoff R, Goold M, Kunzmann N, West P, Speare R (2012) Fluorosis as a probable factor in metabolic bone disease in captive New Zealand native frogs (Leiopelma sp.). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine: September 2012, 43:549-565.
  17. ^ Rod Hitchmough, Leigh Bull and Pam Cromarty (compilers). New Zealand Threat Classification System lists - 2005. Wellington: Department of Conservation. ISBN 0-478-14128-9. Archived from the original on 20 April 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-17. 


Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Belongs to 1 community


EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!