IUCN threat status:

Endangered (EN)

Comprehensive Description

Read full entry

Description

Micryletta steinegeri is a species of frog with a snout-vent length of 21.86 mm – 24.14 mm in males and 25.75 mm – 28.25 mm in females. The head is at least as broad as it is long, and the snout is blunt. The nostrils are large, circular, slightly prominent, and are directed towards the sides and the front of the body. The canthus rostralis is smooth and curved, and the region between the eye and the nostril is almost vertical. The tympana are not visible, though there is a very faint supratympanic fold. The back has a warty texture, whereas the underside is granular. There are many large supernumerary palmar tubercles, and the subarticular tubercles are well defined. Males lack nuptial pads. The fingertips are blunt, and the relative finger lengths are: II < I < IV < III. The tibia length is shorter than the foot length, and the feet lack a tarsal fold. The inner metatarsal tubercle is well defined and either circular or ovoid in shape, whereas the outer metatarsal tubercle is faint in appearance. There are many small supernumerary tubercles on the foot, and the subarticular tubercles on the toes are very prominent. The feet have primitive webbing, and the toe tips are dull except for the fourth toe, which is enlarged. The relative toe lengths are: I < II < V < III < IV (Wang et al. 1989).

The tadpole has an ovoid and depressed body. The snout is wide and curved, and the nostrils are positioned on the top of the snout. There is a slightly rounded, prominent groove running between the nostril and the anterior end of the eye. The eyes are horizontal. The mouth is at the very front of the snout and located on the upper half of the body. The lips are curved inward, and the lower lip extends past the upper lip. It has a medioventral spiracle, and the anus is positioned on the midline of the body. The tail fin is filamentous towards the end, and tapers to a pointed tip (Wang et al. 1989).

It is similar in appearance to M. inornata, though M. inornata differs in having enlarged toe tips, no webbing on the feet, and a smaller ratio of the distance between the eyes to the upper eyelid width. Tadpoles of M. steinegeri are similar to those of Microhyla ornata, although Microhyla ornata differs in having a convex mouth, lighter coloration, and a more evenly tapered tail fin (Wang et al. 1989).

In life, individuals have widely varying coloration. The examined holotype has a purple to orange brown back with a midline that runs from between the eyes to the end of the body. The back may have varying black markings, including stripes, marbling, irregular spots, and/or scarce speckling. The underside is light gray with black marbling. A black stripe runs from the snout tip through the eye, and all the way to the groin. The pupil is black and the iris is golden. The lips are spotted white, though the spotting on the upper lip may form a white line going from the angle of the mouth to the front of the eye. Males have a black throat. The backside of the limbs is orange and spotted black, whereas the undersides are white (Wang et al. 1989).

Much of the variation within the species comes from the coloration and markings, though no description is available on the coloration differences within the species. Additionally, females are much larger than males, and males have a vocal sac (Wang et al. 1989).

The species authority is: Boulenger, G. A. (1909). "Descriptions of four new frogs and a new snake discovered by Mr. H. Sauter in Formosa." Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8, 4, 492-495.

The species epithet, steinegeri, is named after Dr. L. Stejneger, author of the valuable monograph Herpetology of Japan and adjacent territories (Boulenger 1909).

Micryletta steinegeri was first described by Boulenger in 1909, as Microhyla steinegeri. Subsequently, in 1931, Okada thought that M. steinegeri might be a junior synonym for Microhyla fissipes, as described by Boulenger in 1884. In 1934, Parker instead synonymized M. steinegeri with M. inornata, though with reservation. In 1999, Fei removed M. steinegeri from synonymy with M. inornata (Boulenger 1884, Boulenger 1909, Fei 1999, Okada 1931, Parker 1934).

Trusted

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© AmphibiaWeb © 2000-2015 The Regents of the University of California

Source: AmphibiaWeb

Belongs to 0 communities

This taxon hasn't been featured in any communities yet.

Learn more about Communities

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!