Figure 2b.Aporodrilus ponga dorsal view of prolobous prostomium, spermathecae (8lhs and 9lhs and part of 9rhs) and prostate in 18lhs in situ. Male field is shown with setae 17b? and 17a marked (setae a occluded by male pores on 18). [Boxed spermatheca of Notoscolex hakeaphilus Benham, 1949, with Benham’s sketch of its male field and prostate shown for comparison].
Figure 13.Morphology of the lectotype (NHM 1922: 4: 20: 618) of Glyphidrilus fluviatilis Rao, 1922, showing the A external ventral and B internal dorsal views.
Figure 3.A Eisenia nordenskioldi onon ssp. n. Holotype sketched as for Figs 1–2 B Allolobophora harbinensis Kobayashi, 1940: fig. 6 (incertae sedis) for comparison.
Daniel Fernández Marchán, Rosa Fernández, Marta Novo, Darío J. Díaz Cosín
Zookeys
Figure 4.Bayesian inference of the phylogenetic tree on the concatenated sequence. Numbers above branches indicate posterior probability/bootstrap (of the Maximum Likelihood analysis) support values higher than 0.9/70 (shown as asterisks on terminal branches). Black rectangles show clades not recovered in both analyses (the alternative is shown with a dashed line). The cryptic species included in Hormogaster elisae are numbered from 1 to 5 (following Novo et al. 2010).
Ueangfa Bantaowong, Ratmanee Chanabun, Piyoros Tongkerd, Chirasak Sutcharit, Samuel W. James, Somsak Panha
Zookeys
Figure 1.Map of type locality of 1 Amynthas srinan sp. n. from Srinan National Park, Nan province, 2 Amynthas phatubensis sp. n. from Tham Pha Tub Arboretum, Nan province, 3 Amynthas tontong sp. n. from Tontong Waterfall, Pua district, Nan province and 4 Amynthas borealis sp. n. from a small hill near Chaloemprakiat district, Nan province.