Tanya Dewey

a little bit of everything . . .

The EOL Profile Newsfeed contains comments left for its owner by other members, EOL Community invitations, and gathers updates associated with the items in the owner's EOL watch list.

Add a new comment

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Colin Gerety: Thanks for the additional information. I'm still not sure what happened here, but it's clear that we need to change the way we harvest ITIS.

    29 days ago

  • Profile picture of Colin Gerety who took this action.

    Colin Gerety commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Katja Schulz: Just one more piece of info for when you get around to looking at the duplicate taxon problem. "Atriplex truncata" is a good example to look at. In the ITIS taxonomy hierarchy there are two taxon ids: 46189093, and 61378673. Looking at the ancestors for the two ids, there are two distinct hierarchies. The 61378673 hierarchy corresponds to the current ITIS hierarchy. The hierarchies have many entries with duplicate taxa. They finally jump back together at subkingdom Viridaeplantae. My suspicion is that ITIS may have recategorized. If you want to save historical data for any taxonomy provider there is a huge problem. If you just want current data from each provider (which I think is wise), updates should re-use all existing taxon entries an merely repatch the parent pointers.

    30 days ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Colin Gerety: Thanks, I think I see what you mean. I'm not sure what causes this duplication. We will have to investigate. It could be that there is a glitch that improperly generates new EOL hierarchy entries when data are reharvested from the source. It looks like this currently manifests itself only in the API and not on the site. I fear that this problem may not get fixed until EOL v3 which is scheduled for release next year.

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Colin Gerety who took this action.

    Colin Gerety commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Katja Schulz: Katja, Thank you for your quick response. The basic question is one of invariants. For the eol taxonomy to be accurate I think each unique node in the source taxonomy (in this case ITIS) should have exactly one node in the eol representation of that taxonomy. In the case I gave, there are three eol taxon entries (54403812, 46208079, and 61398808) representing a single ITIS taxonomy node (TSN 29130). That is, there are three distinct entries that share the same nameAccordingTo and sourceIdentifier. The parents are of interest only because they indicate the duplication may extend up the tree.

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Colin Gerety: Hi Colin, yes multiple names from ITIS are mapped to EOL taxon 130363, but only one of the names (Geranium caespitosum TSN 29130) is accepted by ITIS. The others are considered synonyms: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=29130#null It looks like 61398785 is the ITIS Geranium (TSN 29104), but it's not clear where 4620835 comes from. The hierarchy entry api gives an error for this value. There may be a mismapping here. They should all map to TSN 29104. We would probably have to go back to the original resource to investigate.

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Colin Gerety who took this action.

    Colin Gerety commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    I am using both ITIS and EOL to classify specimens. As part of this process I find an ITIS_TSN (unique name id) and map it to eol TaxonIDs and TaxonConcepts. Sometimes are multiple eol taxon trees for the same ITIS TSN. That is, a single taxon in the source taxonomy tree has multiple representations in eol. The eol page/concept 130363 has three taxon entries for the ITIS_TSN 29130. These are 54403812, 46208079, and 61398808. Each of these points to the page/concept 130363. Two of them have a parent taxon of 4620835, one has a parent of 6139875. That means there is one ITIS taxonomy tree where the species is represented twice. In the third tree the whole ITIS taxonomy is duplicated.

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Abhishek Shivkumar who took this action.

    Abhishek Shivkumar commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Yan Wong: Thanks, Would you know Jeremy Rice's email ID or any other email ID where I can clarify a couple of quick questions regarding the Pages API? Also, is there a limit on how many calls I can make with a licence with Page API per day / hour?

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Yan Wong who took this action.

    Yan Wong commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    @Abhishek Shivkumar: That's a good question. I have't tried getting deep down into the pages before. It might just be timing out, I guess. This is probably a question for Jeremy Rice

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Abhishek Shivkumar who took this action.

    Abhishek Shivkumar commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    I want to get complete details using the Page API for page id = 282. It has around 800K images ! and so I see in the Page API that I have to make a call in phases of 75 images per call (images_per_page = 75 & images_page=1.. and then again images_per_page = 75 & image_page = 2 .. and so on). I seem to not get a response back from the server after few calls (like 45 calls or something). Is there a way to get the complete json description of this page id = 282 in a single shot? Thanks Abhishek S

    about 1 month ago

  • Profile picture of Thomas Horn who took this action.

    Thomas Horn commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: Thanks for the update.

    4 months ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @José R Ferrer-Paris: Sorry, I missed your reply. Adding species to Wikipedia will work to get them added to EOL. The only problem right now is that Wikipedia imports are on hold. When they start up again, hopefully soon, your species should become available on EOL.

    4 months ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Thomas Horn: The Wikipedia import is on hold at the moment. I'm not sure when it will resume. We are working on a new way of harvesting Wikipedia that will cover all languages and will result in better taxon coverage. So far we've only harvested the English version, and we are only harvesting family level and below. The work list is not currently filtered by language. There will be better language filters in the new version of EOL that's currently under development.

    4 months ago

  • Profile picture of Bob Corrigan who took this action.

    Bob Corrigan commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Thomas Horn: Hi Thomas, a member of the staff will reply to your question - we've got folks on the road right now so there's a bit of a delay. Thanks.

    4 months ago

  • Profile picture of Thomas Horn who took this action.

    Thomas Horn commented on "EOL Curators":

    How can I make sure, that Wikipedia articles are found by EOL and subsequently are available in the curator working list? I input German common names of taxa but Wikipedia articles seem not to be recognized (after two weeks). Furthermore the working list does not appear to be filtered by language since English Wikipedia articles are in the "German" list. Thanks!

    4 months ago

  • Profile picture of José R Ferrer-Paris who took this action.

    José R Ferrer-Paris commented on "EOL Curators":

    @Katja Schulz: The problem is that some endemic andean butterflies do not show in any of the taxonomies of EOL (for example Diaphanos huberi, Steromapedaliodes sanchezi, and the new species of Redonda). I already have wikipedia entries for some species, for example for Redonda chiquinquirana there are entries in the english (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redonda_chiquinquirana) and spanish wikipedia (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redonda_chiquinquirana) and on wikispecies (https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Redonda_chiquinquirana). Will they get automatically included when the wikipedia content gets harvested again?

    5 months ago

  • Profile picture of Katja Schulz who took this action.

    Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Curators":

    @José R Ferrer-Paris: The best way to add a new species to EOL is to upload content for them. Usually, uploading an image to Flickr or adding a Wikipedia articles about the species will do the trick. However, at the moment, the updating of large resources like Flickr and Wikipedia is on hiatus due to some much needed rebuilding of our harvesting code. So it would take a while for the species to get to EOL that way. If you could produce a small resource about the species based on your paper, we could use that to add the species quickly. Do you have images or text that you could upload to EOL for each of the species you want to add to the taxonomy?

    5 months ago

  • Profile picture of José R Ferrer-Paris who took this action.

    José R Ferrer-Paris commented on "EOL Curators":

    What is the best way to add a new species to EOL? last year we published descriptions of several butterfly species in the genus Redonda (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae), how can I add information about them if they do not appear in the EOL taxonomies?

    5 months ago

  • Profile picture of F. Peregrinus who took this action.
    F. Peregrinus joined the community "EOL API Discussion Group".

    5 months ago

  • Profile picture of Thomas Horn who took this action.

    Thomas Horn commented on "EOL API Discussion Group":

    Search using common names - incomplete results: When searching for the common name "birke" (English=birch) only 3 results are returned. http://eol.org/api/search/1.0.json?q=birke&page=1&exact=false&filter_by_taxon_concept_id=&filter_by_hierarchy_entry_id=&filter_by_string=&cache_ttl= (e.g. "Moor-Birke" is found as German common name of Betula pubescens) Since I would expect more results, I checked other taxa and if they have been associated with German common names. Betula pendula for example is associated with the common name "Hänge-Birke" but does not show up in the search result. http://eol.org/pages/1149364/names/common_names Why is that?

    5 months ago

  • Profile picture of Jennifer Hammock who took this action.

    Jennifer Hammock split the classifications by BOLDS resource for species-level taxa from Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 to their own page.

    7 months ago