dcsimg

Comprehensive Description

provided by Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology
Orconectes (Gremicambarus) immunis (Hagen)

Cambarus immunis Hagen, 1870:71, pl. 1: figs. 101, 102, pl. 3: fig. 160; pl. 8: fig. b.

Cambarus signifer Herrick, 1882:253, fig. 7. [Types, MCZ 3515 (2 male I, 1 female). Type locality, Grass Lake, Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota.]

Cambarus immunis spinirostris Faxon, 1884:146. [Types, USNM 4655 (6 male II, 8 female), MCZ 3562 (2 male II, 2 female). Type locality. Reelfoot Lake, Obion County, Tennessee.]

Cambarus immunis immunis.—Faxon, 1884:146 [by implication].

Cambarus immunis var. spinostris.—Harris, 1901:115 [erroneous spelling].

Cambarus rinmunis.—Steele, 1902:3 [erroneous spelling].

Cambarus (Faxonius) immunis.—Ortmann, 1905c:113.

Faxonius immunis.—Williamson, 1907:749 [Faxonius intended as subgenericname].—Creaser, 1933a:4; 1962:2.

Faxonius (Faxonius) immunis immunis.—Creaser, 1933b:21 [by implication].

Faxonius (Faxonius) immunis pedianus Creaser, 1933b: 14 [Subgenus by implication. Holotype and allotype, USNM 98334, 98335 (male I, female); paratypes, USNM. Type locality, reservoir at Englewood, Denver, Colorado].

Cambarus immunis Hagenianus.—Fleming, 1938:303 [(?) lapsus for C. immunis Hagen].

Orconectes immunis immunis.—Hobbs, 1942a:352 [by implication].—Williams, 1954:890, figs. 200–208.—Fitzpatrick, 1963:61 [by implication].

Orconectes immunis pedianus.—Hobbs, 1942a:352.

Orconectes (Orconectes) immunis immunis.—Hobbs, 1942b:154 [by implication].

Orconectes immunis.—Penn, 1950d:645.—Hobbs, 1974b:30, fig. 164.—Page, 1985b:388, figs. 120–123.—Pflieger, 1987a:20; 1987b:6.

Orconnectes immunis.—Threinen, 1958:2 [erroneous spelling].

Orconectes (Orconectes) immunis.—Hobbs, 1959:894.

Orchonectes immunis.—Dimond et al., 1968:760 [erroneous spelling].

Orconectes imunis.—Ono and Nakajima, 1979:1681 [erroneous spelling].

Orconectes immunis.—Huner and Naqvi, 1984:405 [erroneous spelling].

Orconectes (Gremicambarus) immunis.—Fitzpatrick, 1987a:54.

TYPES.—Syntypes, MCZ 188 (2 male I, 2 ovigerous female.) The “paratypes” of Faxon (1914), MCZ 3355 (1 male I), are dubious “types” because this number was not listed by Hagen (1870:73). Douglas G. Smith has examined MCZ lots 3355, listed as paratypes by Faxon (1914:421), and 1841, listed as such by Hagen 1870:73, and found the former to contain a first form male of O. immunis from Belleville, Illinois, the latter, a marine crustacean from Society Island. Probably Hagen erred in recording the specimen from Belleville as having been catalogued under number 1841. The “paratype” said to be in MHNP could not be located.

TYPE LOCALITY.—Lawn Ridge, Marshall County, Illinois.

RANGE.—Maine and Connecticut to eastern Colorado and Wyoming, and from Alabama to southern Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. Its presence in New England probably resulted from introductions (Douglas G. Smith, in litt.).

HABITAT.—Ponds, roadside ditches, and sluggish streams.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Hobbs, Horton Holcombe, Jr. 1989. "An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda, Astacidae, Cambaridae, Parastacidae)." Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 1-236. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.480

Comprehensive Description

provided by Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology
Orconectes immunis (Hagen)

Cambarus immunis Hagen, 1870:71, pl. 1: figs. 101, 102; pl. 3: fig. 160; pl. 8: fig. b.

Cambarus signifer Herrick, 1882:253, fig. 7. [Types, MCZ 3515 (2 I. ). Type-locality, Grass Lake, Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota.]

Cambarus immunis spinirostris Faxon, 1884:146. [Types, USNM 4655 (6II, 8 ), MCZ 3562 (2II, 2 ). Type-locality, Reelfoot Lake, Obion County, Tennessee.]

Cambarus immunis immunis.—Faxon, 1884:146 [by implication].

Cambarus immunis var. spinosiris.—Harris, 1901b: 115 [erroneous spelling].

Cambarus rinmunis.—Steele, 1902:3 [erroneous spelling].

Cambarus (Faxonius) immunis.—Ortmann, 1905c: 113.

Faxonius immunis.—Williamson, 1907:749 [Faxonius intended as subgeneric name].—Creaser, 1933a:4; 1962:2.

Faxonius (Faxonius) immunis immunis.—Creaser, 1933b:21 [by implication].

Faxonius (Faxonius) immunis pedianus Creaser, 1933b:14. [Subgenus by implication. Holotype and allotype, USNM 98334, 98335 (I, ); paratypes, USNM. Type-locality, reservoir at Englcwood, Denver, Colorado.]

Cambarus immunis Hagenianus.—Fleming, 1938:303 [lapsus for C. immunis Hagen].

Orconectes immunis immunis.—Hobbs, 1942a:352 [by implication].—Williams, 1954:890, figs. 200–208.—Fitzpatrick, 1963:61 [by implication].

Orconectes immunis pedianus.—Hobbs, 1942a:352.

Orconectes (Orconectes) immunis immunis.—Hobbs, 1942b: 154 [by implication].

Orconectes immunis.—Penn, 1950d:645.

Orconnectes immunis.—Threincn, 1958:2 [erroneous spelling].

Orconectes (Orconectes) immunis.—Hobbs, 1959:894.

Orchonectes immunis.—Dimond et al., 1968:760 [erroneous spelling of generic name].

TYPES.—Syntypes, MCZ 188 (2 I, 2 ). The “paratypes” of Faxon (1914:421), MCZ 3355, are dubious “types” because this number was not listed by Hagen (1870:73). The “paratype” said to be in MHNP could not be located.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Lawn Ridge, Marshall County, Illinois.

RANGE.—Massachusetts to Wyoming and Alabama to Ontario.

HABITAT.—Ponds, roadside ditches, and sluggish streams.

Orconectes incomptus Hobbs and Barr

Orconectes incomptus Hobbs and Barr, 1972:32, fig. 9.

TYPES.—Holotype, allotype, and morphotype, USNM 130299, 130300, 130301 (I, , II); paratypes, USNM, H. H. Hobbs III.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Cherry Cave, lat. 36°28′09″ N.. long. 85°36′28″ W., Jackson County, Tennessee.

RANGE.—Known only from three localities in Jackson County, Tennessee.

HABITAT.—Subterranean waters.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Hobbs, Horton Holcombe, Jr. 1974. "A Checklist of the North and Middle American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae and Cambaridae)." Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 1-161. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.166