dcsimg

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

provided by AnAge articles
Maximum longevity: 12.3 years (wild)
license
cc-by-3.0
copyright
Joao Pedro de Magalhaes
editor
de Magalhaes, J. P.
partner site
AnAge articles

Pipilo erythrophthalmus

provided by DC Birds Brief Summaries

A medium-sized (7-8 ½ inches) songbird, the male Eastern Towhee is most easily identified by its black head and body, black breast, pale belly, and rufous flanks. Female Eastern Towhees are similar but paler, with the black replaced by brown. Most individuals have red eyes, although birds from Florida and Georgia tend to have white eyes instead. The Eastern Towhee breeds across much of the eastern United States and southern Canada west to Nebraska and Saskatchewan. In winter, many northern birds move south to the southern part of this species’ range as well as east Texas, Oklahoma, and southern Louisiana, where this species does not breed. Southern birds generally migrate short distances, if at all. Eastern Towhees breed in a variety of woodland habitats, particularly in heavily-vegetated undergrowth near forest edges or clearings. This species utilizes similar habitats in summer as in winter. Eastern Towhees mainly eat a variety of plant and animal foods, including fruits, berries, and insects. In appropriate habitat, Eastern Towhees may be seen foraging for food on the ground or, less frequently, in the canopy. Birdwatchers may also listen for this species’ song, a trilled “drink-your-teeeeee” or “towhee towheeeee,” from which this species derives its name. Eastern Towhees are primarily active during the day.

Threat Status: Least Concern

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Smithsonian Institution
author
Reid Rumelt

Pipilo erythrophthalmus

provided by EOL authors

A medium-sized (7-8 ½ inches) songbird, the male Eastern Towhee is most easily identified by its black head and body, black breast, pale belly, and rufous flanks. Female Eastern Towhees are similar but paler, with the black replaced by brown. Most individuals have red eyes, although birds from Florida and Georgia tend to have white eyes instead. The Eastern Towhee breeds across much of the eastern United States and southern Canada west to Nebraska and Saskatchewan. In winter, many northern birds move south to the southern part of this species’ range as well as east Texas, Oklahoma, and southern Louisiana, where this species does not breed. Southern birds generally migrate short distances, if at all. Eastern Towhees breed in a variety of woodland habitats, particularly in heavily-vegetated undergrowth near forest edges or clearings. This species utilizes similar habitats in summer as in winter. Eastern Towhees mainly eat a variety of plant and animal foods, including fruits, berries, and insects. In appropriate habitat, Eastern Towhees may be seen foraging for food on the ground or, less frequently, in the canopy. Birdwatchers may also listen for this species’ song, a trilled “drink-your-teeeeee” or “towhee towheeeee,” from which this species derives its name. Eastern Towhees are primarily active during the day.

References

  • Eastern Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus). The Internet Bird Collection. Lynx Edicions, n.d. Web. 20 July 2012.
  • Greenlaw, Jon S. 1996. Eastern Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/262
  • Pipilo erythrophthalmus. Xeno-canto. Xeno-canto Foundation, n.d. Web. 20 July 2012.
  • eBird Range Map - Eastern Towhee. eBird. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, N.d. Web. 20 July 2012.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
copyright
Smithsonian Institution
bibliographic citation
Rumelt, Reid B. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. June-July 2012. Brief natural history summary of Pipilo erythrophthalmus. Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C.
author
Robert Costello (kearins)
original
visit source
partner site
EOL authors

Common Names

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
COMMON NAME: [3]




eastern towhee
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Direct Effects of Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: fire interval, fire severity, forest, severity

Adult eastern towhees are unlikely to suffer directly from fire. It is generally accepted that large, fast-moving fires can result in mortality, but birds typically have the mobility to avoid fire [19,23,76]. Spotted towhees (Pipilo maculatus), birds that are closely related and have similar habits as eastern towhees, were observed alive after a fire in California coastal sage scrub [12].

It is likely that eggs and young birds are much more vulnerable to fire. Although there were no data directly investigating eastern towhee nest mortality due to fire as of early 2006, literature reviews have used life history characteristics to speculate on possible effects of fire on nesting success and bird populations [62,77]. Since eastern towhees nest near the ground, low-severity surface fires during the breeding season could result in considerable nest mortality. However, the degree to which a population would be affected by fire would depend on several factors including occurrence of renesting, season of burn, fire interval, fire uniformity, and fire severity. Since eastern towhees have the tendency to renest, this may mitigate at least some of the impact a breeding-season fire would have [62,77]. Over 2 breeding seasons, 7 of 33 eastern towhee nests observed in a mature loblolly pine forest that had burned between 1 to 2 and 3 to 4 years earlier produced at least 1 fledgling [99]. The daily nest survival rate was 89%, and a mean of 0.68 fledgling was produced per active nest. These values could not be compared to the unburned site due to the lack of nests found there [99]. Higher [93] and lower [52] daily nest survival rates have been reported for eastern towhees in other areas (see Timing of Major Life History Events).

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Distribution

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals

The eastern towhee occurs throughout the eastern United States. Occurrences from southern Saskatchewan and Quebec south to Florida, and west to eastern Texas are noted in a literature review. Populations north of southern New England through northern Indiana and Illinois to southern Iowa are primarily summer residents [42]. A general range map for the eastern towhee is available at Cornell's All About Birds, and a summer distribution map of the eastern towhee from Breeding Bird Survey data (1966-1996) can be found at Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.

Pipilo e. erythrophthalmus occurs in the most northerly part of the eastern towhee's distribution in the summer, and migrates to the southern and eastern portion of the species' range in the winter. The other subspecies are largely residents [69]. Pipilo e. canaster occurs from south-central Louisiana, north to northeastern Louisiana east through Mississippi, extreme southwestern Tennessee, northern Alabama and Georgia, central South Carolina to western North Carolina, and south to northwestern Florida and east along the Gulf Coast [1]. The range of P. e. rileyi extends from northern Florida through southern Georgia and coastal South Carolina to east-central North Carolina. Pipilo e. alleni occurs in peninsular Florida [69].

The following lists are based on eastern towhee distribution information and the habitat characteristics and plant species composition of vegetation communities eastern towhees are known to occupy. There is not conclusive evidence that eastern towhees occur in all the habitat types listed, and some community types, especially those in the western portion of the eastern towhee's range, may have been omitted. Abundance of eastern towhees in the community types listed is quite variable. Some plant communities support eastern towhees only in stands of specific ages or types, while others provide suitable habitat throughout. See Preferred Habitat/Cover for more detail.

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Food Habits

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: frequency, seed, tree

Eastern towhees primarily eat on the ground, although they also glean from vegetation. In a southeastern Massachusetts pitch pine barren, 73.5% of male and 80.4% of female foraging observations were on the ground [66]. When foraging on the ground eastern towhees use a scratching technique where both feet kick back simultaneously [40,86]. In a laboratory study 4 eastern towhees used this method to successfully obtain seed buried almost 1 inch (2.25 cm) deep [98]. When foraging above ground the majority of time is spent gleaning foliage [66]. In Massachusetts, 22.5% of male and 16.3% of female foraging observations were of food being gleaned from foliage. Eastern towhees were also observed gleaning from twigs, branches, and trunks. When gleaning, eastern towhees occurred significantly (p<0.01) more often on the distal half of tree branches compared to using distal and proximal portions equally (see Foraging Habitat). In 0.5% of male and 0.3% of female foraging observations, eastern towhees hovered. Eastern towhees were never observed catching food out of the air [66].

Eastern towhees eat a variety of plant and animal matter. In literature reviews, eastern towhees are reported to eat seeds and fruits, several invertebrates, and occasionally small amphibians, snakes, and lizards [86]. Reviews report eastern towhees foraging at feeders [17,42]. Reviews show that animal matter makes up a larger proportion of the diet in the breeding season [42,63]. In fall and winter, plants make up 79% and 85% of the diet, respectively. This drops to 53% in spring and 43% in summer [63]. Insects such as beetles (Coleoptera), grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera), ants, wasps, and bees (Hymenoptera), and moths and caterpillars (Lepidoptera) are common prey items. Eastern towhees eat other invertebrates such as spiders (Araneae), millipedes (Diplopoda), centipedes (Chilopoda), and snails (Gastropoda) to a lesser extent [42,63]. Plants that comprise at least 5% of the eastern towhee diet include ragweed (Ambrosia spp.), oak, smartweed (Polygonum spp.), and corn (Zea mays) in the Northeast and blackberry, oak, panicgrass (Panicum spp.), ragweed, and wax-myrtle (Morella cerifera) in the Southeast [63]. The following table, adapted from Greenlaw's [42] literature review, shows the relative total volume (%) and frequency of occurrence (%, in parentheses) of different food items found in the stomach contents of adult eastern towhees.

Northeastern Region Midwestern Region Southeast Atlantic/Mid-Gulf Region May-June Sept-Oct May-June Sept-Oct May-June Sept-Oct Insects (adult) 29.6 (93) 0.6 (40) 49.2 (98) 35.1 (91) 32.8 (95) 2.5 (73) Insects (immature) 5.4 (24) 0 4.7 (25) 2.4 (13) 13.0 (46) 0 Spiders 0.3 (6) 0.8 (20) 1.3 (17) 0.5 (13) 1.7 (18) 0 Millipedes 0.5 (9) 0.6 (20) 2.8 (15) 0.3 (9) 0.1 (2) 0 Centipedes 0 0.4 (20) 0.1 (2) 0 0 0 Snails 0.3 (3) 0 0.1 (6) 0 0.1 (2) 0 Plant 63.8 (91) 97.6 (100) 42.0 (67) 61.4 (83) 49.8 (79) 97.5 (100)
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Habitat-related Fire Effects

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, fire exclusion, fire interval, fire regime, fire severity, forest, frequency, fruit, grassland, habitat type, herb, herbaceous, litter, low-severity fire, seed, severity, shrubs, species richness, stand-replacing fire, succession, wildfire

Despite the abundance of articles addressing the effect of fire on eastern towhees, results should be interpreted with caution. As noted by a literature review summarizing songbird responses to fire in southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests [32], there are several limitations to many studies addressing bird response to fire. Many studies focus on breeding communities and use composite statistics, such as species richness. Many are opportunistic, restricted in spatial or temporal scale, include confounding factors and/or lack sufficient replication. Very few compare demographic parameters of a given species between burned and unburned vegetation, which is necessary to determine if the site is meeting the needs of a species [32].

Given that eastern towhees are strongly associated with low woody cover (see Preferred Habitat/Cover), their response is likely influenced by the interaction of habitat type, fire interval, fire uniformity, and fire severity. In habitats such as loblolly-shortleaf pineland and slash pine flatwoods, fairly frequent low-severity fires appear to benefit eastern towhees [14,30,99]. However in habitats such as tallgrass prairie, frequent fires eliminate eastern towhee from the habitat [106], likely due to a decline in shrubby cover. Patchy fires may benefit eastern towhees, due to increased edge (see Effects of spatial arrangement/area) and decreased damage to existing understory vegetation. Due to their cover requirements (see Preferred Habitat/Cover), eastern towhees may be affected by fires severe enough to seriously impact understory vegetation [94]. In cover types where eastern towhees occur primarily in early successional habitat, large stand-replacing fires may create patches that would provide eastern towhee habitat several years after the burn. Eastern towhees have been observed on a sand pine (Pinus clausa) scrub site in Florida 3 to 7 years after it was burned in a severe wildfire and subsequently salvage logged [38].

Eastern towhee's response to fire depends in part on the vegetation community. In some habitat types eastern towhees are present soon after burning, while in other habitat types eastern towhees do not occur on recently burned areas. For example, the average number of eastern towhee detections per census was approximately 5 on an old field pineland in Florida that had been winter-burned annually for approximately 30 years [30]. In Arkansas, eastern towhees occurred at a density of 6 territorial males/40 ha the spring following a winter burn in a field that had been dominated by broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus) and sassafras (Sassafras albidum) saplings [81]. Eastern towhees were also observed on wetlands burned 6 months earlier [95]. However, in an Indiana oak forest that had been surface burned 1 to 2 years and 3 to 4 years before sampling, eastern towhees were absent despite their occurrence in unburned control plots [5]. Eastern towhees did not occur in annually burned tallgrass prairies, but were observed in unburned (>10 years) tallgrass prairie in some years [106]. Eastern towhees did not occur in frequently burned longleaf pine sandhill plots [75]. In areas of Minnesota where frequent (12-26 fires in 32 years) fires were being used to restore oak savanna once dominated by bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) and northern pin oak (Q. ellipsoidalis), eastern towhees were associated with unburned vegetation [21].

In some habitats eastern towhees increase after prescribed surface fires. Shortly after fire was excluded from an old-field loblolly-shortleaf (P. echinata) pineland that had previously been burned annually, eastern towhee occurrence increased. Eastern towhee detections per census increased from approximately 5 in postfire year 1 to over 12 in the 4th postfire year. After 4 years eastern towhee detections gradually declined. After 11 years of fire exclusion, eastern towhee detections were less than in the 1st postfire year. Due to eastern towhee absence in a beech-magnolia (Fagus-Magnolia spp.) stand, the authors predicted that as succession continues and the proportion of deciduous canopy increases, eastern towhees will eventually leave the site [30]. In coastal scrub and slash pine flatwoods in east-central Florida, eastern towhee densities were significantly (p=0.007) higher (4.5/ha) on sites that had burned 4 years before the survey than those that had been burned 1 year before (2.3/ha), 2 years before (3.3/ha), or more than 10 years before (2.6/ha) the survey [14]. The habitat with the greatest number of eastern towhees detected on Eglin Air Force Base in Florida was a "mature flatwoods" that had been burned 1 to 5 years before the survey. Eastern towhee detections in this habitat were significantly (p<0.05) greater than in both the burned (1-3 years previously) and unburned (for several decades) sandhills dominated by mature (>50 yr) longleaf pine [92]. In a loblolly pine forest with a mid-story dominated by oaks (Quercus spp.) and hickories (Carya spp.), eastern towhee abundance was significantly (p<0.05) greater on sites that had been burned either 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years before sampling (detections/count/site=3.79) compared to sites that had not been burned for more than 20 years (detections/count/site=1.44). Eastern towhees were also observed at higher frequencies in burned areas (89%) compared to unburned areas (74%) [99]. Three areas in Pennsylvania, one unburned area, one that had been burned 1 year earlier, and one that had been burned 2 years earlier were comprised of various habitats including a bluestem (Andropogon spp.) community, a scrub oak (bear oak and dwarf oak (Q. prinoides) community, a scrub oak-mixed aspen community, a scrub oak-pitch pine community, and a scrub oak-mixed-oak community. Eastern towhees were the most common bird in all three areas, but occurred at the highest density, approximately 0.67 singing male/ha, in the 2-year-old burn. In the unburned it occurred at a density of about 0.43 singing male/ha, and in the 1-year-old burn singing male eastern towhees occurred at a density of about 0.38/ha [83].

Differences in vegetation structure after burning may explain at least some of the variation in eastern towhee's response. A literature review demonstrated that changes in bird communities after fire are associated with the degree of structural change in the vegetation. More structurally complex habitats and more severe fires result in longer periods before the prefire bird community returns. For instance, the prefire bird community is typically restored about 3 years after a grassland fire, while it can take over 30 years for the prefire bird community to return after a stand-replacing forest fire [48]. Data on vegetation in areas where eastern towhee did and did not occur after fire show the effects of much smaller changes in vegetation structure. Vegetation on burned and unburned areas differed in an investigation that found significantly (p<0.05) higher eastern towhee abundance in burned areas. The unburned stands of loblolly pine with an understory of oaks and hickories had significantly (p<0.05) more hardwoods and total trees (≥7.5 cm dbh/ha), more snags and logs (≥7.5 cm/ha), higher percentage canopy closure, higher percentage of leaf litter, and lower percentage of herb cover than burned plots [99]. In contrast, an Indiana study area comprised of oak (Quercus spp.) dominated forests, chestnut oak (Q. prinus) woodlands, oak-hickory forests, and American beech (Fagus grandifolia)-sugar maple forests that were burned twice in 4 years had lower density of small 1 inch (<2.5 cm) dbh live woody stems and less horizontal vegetation cover below 1.6 feet (0.5 m) than the unburned site. In this study, eastern towhees were observed in the unburned vegetation, but not in the burned area [4,5].

Severity of the fire is also likely have a major impact on eastern towhee's response. In a literature review, it is suggested that fires of any severity are likely to affect ground-nesting birds, since even low-severity fire is likely to have large impacts on the vegetation they use [61]. Rotenberry and others [78] hypothesize in a literature review that "cool" and "intermediate" burns could increase food availability and leave adequate vegetation for ground-nesting birds. Data comparing eastern towhee densities among burns of varying severity are lacking. Observations of a pitch pine barren site in New Jersey shortly after a fairly extensive wildfire occurred in late winter/early spring did provide some information. The number of eastern towhees declined in some burned areas and increased in areas adjacent to the burn area. However, in areas within the burn where the vegetation was only slightly damaged and new growth provided cover, eastern towhee abundance was not affected [94]. In South Carolina, average weekly adult eastern towhee survival rates were not significantly (p=0.15) different in young (2-5 years old) longleaf pine stands than in mature (32-97 years old) longleaf pine stands that were occasionally thinned and surface burned under prescription every 3 to 5 years [52]. Eastern towhees were observed on a sand pine scrub site in Florida subject to a stand-replacing fire and salvage logging between 5 and 7 years before sampling. The following table shows the average density (number/km²) of eastern towhees on the burned and salvaged site and on a mature (≥55 years since stand-replacing fire) forest site [38].

Burned and salvaged Mature Spring 286.1 147.2 Winter 197.2 111.1

Seasonal effect of burning on eastern towhee is uncertain. Literature reviews suggest that burns during the breeding season are likely to have a larger impact on ground-nesting birds, both directly through nest mortality and indirectly through greater and/or more persistent loss of cover than would likely occur from dormant season burns [61,77]. In addition, once territories are established eastern towhees may be less likely to leave a burned area [29]. No studies to date (2006) have compared eastern towhee demographics on sites burned in varying seasons. However, comparisons of eastern towhee abundance on sites burned during dormant and growing seasons have not resulted in detectable effects. On sites burned every 2 to 4 years in pure and mixed stands of longleaf, loblolly, and shortleaf pine in Georgia, eastern towhee abundance on sites burned between April and August (average of 1.54 birds/plot) was not significantly (p=0.32) different from the sites burned between January and March (average of 2.31 birds/plot) [50]. The following table shows the frequency (%) and abundance (total/40-m radius) of eastern towhees on control plots, plots burned in January, and plots burned in June in a dry prairie/shrubland in southwestern Florida [33]:

  Control Winter burn Summer burn Frequency 44 44 64 Abundance 21 20 25

Fire is likely to have an affect on the availability of eastern towhee food items. Several literature reviews summarize information regarding changes in plant and animal food availability after fire [23,60,78]. Several shrubby species may increase fruit production after fire, although the response is dependent on the species and postfire environmental factors [23]. Seed and fruit production typically increase after fire in southern forests, with peak production from 2 to 6 years after fire. The frequency and season of burning influence plant recovery and fruit production [60]. Lyon and others' [60] review discusses the effect of fire on invertebrates, some of which are eastern towhee prey. Many of the studies found an increase in arthropod availability after understory fires in southern sandhill and loblolly-shortleaf pine forests [60].

Fire ecology: Eastern towhees occur in a variety of habitats with a wide range of FIRE REGIMES. However, areas with the highest towhee densities typically undergo low-severity surface fires at an interval of about 4 to 10 years [14,30]. Fires in the southeastern United States frequently occur in summer due to an increase in the occurrence of lightning strikes [73].

Due to their preference for early successional stands (see Preferred Habitat/Cover), eastern towhees are likely to occur in early to intermediate successional stages after stand-replacing fires.

In herbaceous habitats eastern towhees are most likely to occur in areas where fire exclusion [106] has resulted in establishment of some woody shrubs.

FIRE REGIMES: The following table provides fire return intervals for plant communities and ecosystems where eastern towhee is likely to occur. Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find FIRE REGIMES".

Community or Ecosystem Dominant Species Fire Return Interval Range (years) maple-beech-birch Acer-Fagus-Betula spp. >1,000 silver maple-American elm Acer saccharinum-Ulmus americana <5 to 200 sugar maple Acer saccharum >1,000 sugar maple-basswood Acer saccharum-Tilia americana >1,000 [96] bluestem prairie Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 54,71] bluestem-Sacahuista prairie Andropogon littoralis-Spartina spartinae 71] mangrove Avicennia nitida-Rhizophora mangle 35-200 [68] sugarberry-America elm-green ash Celtis laevigata-Ulmus americana-Fraxinus pennsylvanica <35 to 200 beech-sugar maple Fagus spp.-Acer saccharum >1,000 [96] cedar glades Juniperus virginiana 3-22 [43,71] tamarack Larix laricina 35-200 [71] yellow-poplar Liriodendron tulipifera <35 [96] Everglades Mariscus jamaicensis <10 [68] Great Lakes spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35 to >200 northeastern spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35-200 [27] southeastern spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35 to >200 [96] black spruce Picea mariana 35-200 conifer bog* Picea mariana-Larix laricina 35-200 red spruce* Picea rubens 35-200 [27] pine-cypress forest Pinus-Cupressus spp. <35 to 200 [6] shortleaf pine Pinus echinata 2-15 shortleaf pine-oak Pinus echinata-Quercus spp. <10 slash pine Pinus elliottii 3-8 slash pine-hardwood Pinus elliottii-variable <35 sand pine Pinus elliottii var. elliottii 25-45 [96] South Florida slash pine Pinus elliottii var. densa 1-5 longleaf-slash pine Pinus palustris-P. elliottii 1-4 [68,96] longleaf pine-scrub oak Pinus palustris-Quercus spp. 6-10 [96] red-white-jack pine* Pinus resinosa-P. strobus-P. banksiana 10-300 [27,45] pitch pine Pinus rigida 6-25 [16,46] pocosin Pinus serotina 3-8 pond pine Pinus serotina 3-8 eastern white pine Pinus strobus 35-200 eastern white pine-eastern hemlock Pinus strobus-Tsuga canadensis 35-200 eastern white pine-northern red oak-red maple Pinus strobus-Quercus rubra-Acer rubrum 35-200 loblolly pine Pinus taeda 3-8 loblolly-shortleaf pine Pinus taeda-P. echinata 10 to <35 Virginia pine Pinus virginiana 10 to <35 Virginia pine-oak Pinus virginiana-Quercus spp. 10 to <35 sycamore-sweetgum-American elm Platanus occidentalis-Liquidambar styraciflua-Ulmus americana <35 to 200 [96] eastern cottonwood Populus deltoides <35 to 200 [71] aspen-birch Populus tremuloides-Betula papyrifera 35-200 [27,96] black cherry-sugar maple Prunus serotina-Acer saccharum >1,000 oak-hickory Quercus-Carya spp. <35 northeastern oak-pine Quercus-Pinus spp. 10 to <35 [96] oak-gum-cypress Quercus-Nyssa-spp.-Taxodium distichum 35 to >200 [68] southeastern oak-pine Quercus-Pinus spp. <10 white oak-black oak-northern red oak Quercus alba-Q. velutina-Q. rubra <35 northern pin oak Quercus ellipsoidalis <35 bear oak Quercus ilicifolia <35 bur oak Quercus macrocarpa <10 [96] oak savanna Quercus macrocarpa/Andropogon gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 2-14 [71,96] chestnut oak Quercus prinus 3-8 northern red oak Quercus rubra 10 to <35 post oak-blackjack oak Quercus stellata-Q. marilandica <10 black oak Quercus velutina <35 [96] cabbage palmetto-slash pine Sabal palmetto-Pinus elliottii <10 [68,96] blackland prairie Schizachyrium scoparium-Nassella leucotricha <10 [96] southern cordgrass prairie Spartina alterniflora 1-3 [71] baldcypress Taxodium distichum var. distichum 100 to >300 pondcypress Taxodium distichum var. nutans <35 [68] eastern hemlock-yellow birch Tsuga canadensis-Betula alleghaniensis >200 [96] elm-ash-cottonwood Ulmus-Fraxinus-Populus spp. <35 to 200 [27,96] *fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species review
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Habitat: Cover Types

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):

More info for the terms: cover, swamp

SAF COVER TYPES [31]:





12 Black spruce

13 Black spruce-tamarack

14 Northern pin oak

16 Aspen

17 Pin cherry

18 Paper birch

19 Gray birch-red maple

20 White pine-northern red oak-red maple

21 Eastern white pine

22 White pine-hemlock

23 Eastern hemlock

24 Hemlock-yellow birch

25 Sugar maple-beech-yellow birch

26 Sugar maple-basswood

27 Sugar maple

28 Black cherry-maple

30 Red spruce-yellow birch

31 Red spruce-sugar maple-beech

32 Red spruce

33 Red spruce-balsam fir

34 Red spruce-Fraser fir

38 Tamarack

39 Black ash-American elm-red maple

40 Post oak-blackjack oak

42 Bur oak

43 Bear oak

44 Chestnut oak

45 Pitch pine

46 Eastern redcedar

50 Black locust

51 White pine-chestnut oak

52 White oak-black oak-northern red oak

53 White oak

55 Northern red oak

57 Yellow-poplar

58 Yellow-poplar-eastern hemlock

59 Yellow-poplar-white oak-northern red oak

60 Beech-sugar maple

61 River birch-sycamore

62 Silver maple-American elm

63 Cottonwood

64 Sassafras-persimmon

65 Pin oak-sweetgum

69 Sand pine

70 Longleaf pine

71 Longleaf pine-scrub oak

72 Southern scrub oak

73 Southern redcedar

74 Cabbage palmetto

75 Shortleaf pine

76 Shortleaf pine-oak

78 Virginia pine-oak

79 Virginia pine

80 Loblolly pine-shortleaf pine

81 Loblolly pine

82 Loblolly pine-hardwood

83 Longleaf pine-slash pine

84 Slash pine

85 Slash pine-hardwood

87 Sweetgum-yellow-poplar

88 Willow oak-water oak-diamondleaf (laurel) oak

91 Swamp chestnut oak-cherrybark oak

92 Sweetgum-willow oak

93 Sugarberry-American elm-green ash

94 Sycamore-sweetgum-American elm

95 Black willow

96 Overcup oak-water hickory

98 Pond pine

100 Pondcypress

101 Baldcypress

102 Baldcypress-tupelo

103 Water tupelo-swamp tupelo

104 Sweetbay-swamp tupelo-redbay

105 Tropical hardwoods

106 Mangrove

108 Red maple

109 Hawthorn

110 Black oak

111 South Florida slash pine
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Habitat: Ecosystem

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):

ECOSYSTEMS [36]:





FRES10 White-red-jack pine

FRES11 Spruce-fir

FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine

FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine

FRES14 Oak-pine

FRES15 Oak-hickory

FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress

FRES17 Elm-ash-cottonwood

FRES18 Maple-beech-birch

FRES19 Aspen-birch

FRES39 Prairie

FRES41 Wet grasslands
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Habitat: Plant Associations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):

More info for the terms: bog, forest

KUCHLER [55] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:





K074 Bluestem prairie

K076 Blackland prairie

K077 Bluestem-sacahuista prairie

K078 Southern cordgrass prairie

K079 Palmetto prairie

K080 Marl everglades

K081 Oak savanna

K082 Mosaic of K074 and K100

K083 Cedar glades

K084 Cross Timbers

K089 Black Belt

K091 Cypress savanna

K092 Everglades

K093 Great Lakes spruce-fir forest

K094 Conifer bog

K095 Great Lakes pine forest

K096 Northeastern spruce-fir forest

K097 Southeastern spruce-fir forest

K098 Northern floodplain forest

K099 Maple-basswood forest

K100 Oak-hickory forest

K101 Elm-ash forest

K102 Beech-maple forest

K103 Mixed mesophytic forest

K104 Appalachian oak forest

K105 Mangrove

K106 Northern hardwoods

K107 Northern hardwoods-fir forest

K108 Northern hardwoods-spruce forest

K109 Transition between K104 and K106

K110 Northeastern oak-pine forest

K111 Oak-hickory-pine

K112 Southern mixed forest

K113 Southern floodplain forest

K114 Pocosin

K115 Sand pine scrub

K116 Subtropical pine forest
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Management Considerations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
Data from the Breeding Bird Survey and Christmas Bird Counts show moderate to large declines in eastern towhee populations, especially in the northern part of its range [11,18,44,72]. For example, trends from 3 surveys showed that 1989 population levels were 13% of 1966 levels in the Northeast [44]. A literature review provides some information suggesting the decline has slowed in some areas in recent years [42].

Managing habitat for the eastern towhee and species with similar habitat requirements has been the subject of many articles including [20,22,65,90,104]. Greenlaw's [42] literature review notes the impact of urbanization and agriculture on eastern towhee habitat and asserts the importance of preserving pitch pine barren habitats in the Northeast, where eastern towhees still occur in relatively high densities.
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Predators

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals

Many animals prey on eastern towhees and their eggs, including reptiles, mammals, and birds. A literature review summarizes several reports demonstrating that predators are a major cause of nest failure [42]. The highest nest predation rate noted was 88% in a New York study. Mammals that are likely nest predators include northern raccoons (Procyon lotor), domestic cats (Felis catus), and eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus). Snakes such as bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer), rat snakes (Elaphe spp.) and garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.) have been reported eating eastern towhee eggs. Weasels (Mustela spp.) and blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) are also likely nest predators [42]. Several birds are known to prey on adult eastern towhees, including short-tailed (Buteo brachyurus), sharp-shinned (Accipiter striatus), and Cooper's hawks (Accipiter cooperii) [70,87]. At least some mammals also feed on adult eastern towhees. In Maryland, an eastern towhee was found in the stomach contents of a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) [47].

Brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) parasitize eastern towhee nests. In a South Carolina old field 5 of 19 eastern towhee nests were parasitized [100]. Each parasitized nest contained 1 brown-headed cowbird egg. The desertion rate for parasitized nests was 20%, which was similar to nests that had not been parasitized (21%). Two of the five brown-headed cowbird eggs produced fledglings. The study did not determine if there was a difference in nest success between parasitized and nonparasitized nests [100]. In West Virginia, only 3 of 41 eastern towhee nests were parasitized by the brown-headed cowbird. Average number of fledged young in nonparasitized nests was 2.8, which was similar to the average of 2.7 fledglings per parasitized nest [9]. In a Pennsylvania study site, only 2 of 36 nests were parasitized and both produced eastern towhee fledglings [26]. In a study of nest parasitism on Sanibel Island, none of 5 eastern towhee nests found were parasitized [74].

BEHAVIORS:
Greenlaw's [42] literature review provides a detailed summary on eastern towhee behaviors, such as vocalizations, courtship, territoriality (see Timing of Major Life History Events), and migration (see General Distribution).
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):

BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [10]:





14 Great Plains
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

States or Provinces

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
(key to state/province abbreviations)
UNITED STATES AL AR CT DE FL GA IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO NE NH NJ NY NC ND OH OK PA RI SC SD TN TX VT VA WV WI DC
CANADA MB ON PQ SK
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Taxonomy

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus) is the scientific name for eastern
towhee, a member of the Emberizidae family [3]. In 1995, the American Ornithologists'
Union split the rufous-sided towhee (P. erythrophthalmus)
into the eastern and spotted towhee (P. maculatus) [2].
Hybridization between the 2 species occurs along riparian corridors in the Great
Plains, especially on the Platte River [42,82]. The 4 eastern towhee
subspecies recognized by the American Ornithological Union [1] are:



P. e. ssp. erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus)

P. e. ssp. alleni Coues

P. e. ssp. canaster Howell

P. e. ssp. rileyi Koelz
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Use of Fire in Population Management

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, fire exclusion, fire interval, forest, stand-replacing fire

When managing for eastern towhees, fire interval should be carefully considered before implementing a burning plan [14,42]. Surface burns in open woodlands, grasslands, and wetlands at intervals that would eventually reduce low woody cover would likely result in eastern towhee declines. Eastern towhees have been observed to peak 4 years after fire in Florida on an old-field loblolly-shortleaf pineland, in slash pine flatwoods with saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), myrtle oak, and sand live oak in the understory, and in a scrub community comprised of scattered slash pine and cabbage palm [14,30]. The most favorable fire interval for eastern towhee depends on the habitat and other management objectives, but fire intervals of ≤3 yrs will likely result in eastern towhee absence or smaller population sizes. Fire exclusion in these areas is also likely to cause eastern towhee declines. As the canopy closes the low shrubby species that provide cover and food decline. Four years after fire in a Florida old-field loblolly-shortleaf pineland, eastern towhee detections gradually declined. Eleven years after fire eastern towhee detections were less than detections 1 year after fire [30].

Less is known about eastern towhees response to severe fires. In dense-canopied forests, stand-replacing fires may provide patches of early successional vegetation necessary for eastern towhee occurrence. Although there are no data on eastern towhee occurrence in severely burned forest, eastern towhees have increased on sites subjected to other canopy-opening disturbances that may have less effect on the understory, such as wind throw or logging [28,39,91]. On a sand pine scrub site in Florida that was burned in a stand-replacing fire and salvage logged 5 to 7 years earlier, eastern towhees were more abundant than on a mature, control site. The extent to which eastern towhees were responding to the effects salvage logging is unknown [38].

Although it is likely that reasonable inferences regarding eastern towhees response can be made from the impact fire has on understory vegetation, other factors such as a fire's affect on food availability and abundance of predators and competitors should also be considered when using fire as a management tool for eastern towhee [78].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Meyer, Rachelle. 2006. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/bird/pier/all.html

Comprehensive Description

provided by Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology
Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus)

In the last general survey of the brown-headed cowbird's hosts (Friedmann, 1963:150–151), it was noted that few instances of parasitism on this towhee had been reported from California, but that the recent spread and increase of the parasite in the southern parts of that state would probably result in further records. Three such instances have come to light: 1, collected in San Luis Obispo County, 2 June 1934, is now in the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, and 2 more—1 from near Mendota, Fresno County, 1 June 1935, and 1 from near Stockton, 21 June 1942—are in the collections of the Western Foundation. The San Luis Obispo record involves the host subspecies P. erythrophthalmus megalonyx; the other 2 have to do with the race P. erythrophthalmus falcinellus. The last mentioned subspecies is new to the host catalog of the parasite.

The Western Foundation's collections contain 393 sets of eggs of this towhee (all races), 11 of which (2.8 percent) are parasitized. A list of only those races of the host known to be victimized by the cowbird, yields the following data: P. erythrophthalmus erythrophthalmus, 55 sets, 9 (16.3 percent) parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus falcinellus, 8 sets, 2 (25.0 percent) parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus canaster, 3 sets, none parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus arcticus, 7 sets, none parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus montanus, 14 sets, none parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus curtatus, 1 set, not parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus oreganus, 37 sets, none parasitized; P. erythrophthalmus falcifer, 57 sets, none parasitized; and P. erythrophthalmus megalonyx, 173 sets, none parasitized.

The Ontario nest records files at Toronto have data on 70 nests, 14 of which (20.0 percent) were parasitized.

BROWN TOWHEE
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Friedmann, Herbert, Kiff, Lloyd F., and Rothstein, Stephen I. 1977. "A further contribution of knowledge of the host relations of the parasitic cowbirds." Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 1-75. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.235

Pipilo erythrophthalmus ( Asturian )

provided by wikipedia AST
Map marker icon – Nicolas Mollet – Birds – Nature – white.png Les especies d'aves con nome común en llingua asturiana márquense como NOA. En casu contrariu, conséñase'l nome científicu o de la SEO.

'''Pipilo erythrophthalmus tamién denomináu arrascador pintu escuru,[1] arrascador nororiental o ojirrojo, chingolo puntiáu y toquí pintu,[2] ye una especie d'ave paseriforme de la familia de los emberízidos que vive n'América. La so taxonomía ye una tema aldericada en ornitoloxía, pos dalgunos consideren como una sola especie a una serie de poblaciones morfolóxicamente diverses ente sigo que se distribúin por América del Norte, Méxicu y Guatemala, ente qu'otres opiniones xulgar como 2, 3, o 4 especies distintes.

El presente artículu basar na llista d'aves de Sibley-Monroe, que toma en cuenta una sola especie. Pal casu d'Estaos Xuníos, la Unión d'Ornitólogos d'esi país reconoz dos especies: P. erythrophtalmus y P. maculatus, criteriu que sigue la Unión Internacional pal Caltenimientu de la Naturaleza. En Méxicu esisten dos variedaes autóctones, que suelen ser consideraes a nivel de subespecie o especie: P. (y.) macronyx y P. (y.) socorrensis.

Descripción

 src=
Fema del grupu erythrophthalmus.

Estes aves miden ente 18 y 21 cm de llargor, son de güeyos coloraos y presenten llixeru dimorfismu sexual. El machu tien la cabeza, la parte cimera del pechu y les partes dorsales negres o pardes escures, con dellos llurdios claros en llombu, nales y cola; los lladrales son color canela y el pechu ye blancu. La fema caltién el mesmu patrón, pero ye menos escura nes partes cimeres.

Peterson y Chalif estremen cuatro morfos, que podríen constituyir subespecies o especies:

1) L'arrascador del este (grupu erythrophthalmus). Les partes dorsales negres o pardes bien escures, con dellos llurdios blancos nes nales pero non nel llombu. Habita nel este de los Estaos Xuníos.

 src=
Machu del grupu maculatus, col llombu enllordiáu. Columbia Británica (Canadá).

2) L'arrascador enllordiáu (grupu maculatus). Coles partes dorsales negres o pardes escures, con llurdios blancos en nales y llombu. Oeste de Norteamérica, Méxicu y Guatemala.

3) L'arrascador de llombu olivácea (grupu macronyx). Coles partes dorsales color pardu oliváceo, con llurdios claros en llombu y nales. Centru de Méxicu.

4) L'arrascador de Socorru (grupu socorrensis). Sensiblemente más pequeñu que los demás. De color gris nes partes dorsales, con llurdios más claros nel llombu. Isla Socorro (Méxicu).

La American Ornithologists' Union reconoz dos especies, la especie del este (P. erythrophthalmus) y la del oeste (P. maculatus), y dientro d'ésta última inclúi los morfos de Socorru y del centru de Méxicu. Sicasí, la población de Socorru ye n'ocasiones considerada una especie distinta.

Los trés morfos de tierra firme son capaces d'entecruzase. El morfo maculatus se sobrelapa na so distribución colos otros dos. Adicionalmente, esti morfo hibridar en Méxicu col arrascador pintu collarejo (P. ocai).

Busquen el so alimentu buscando alimentu nel suelu, ente la foyarasca seca, o ente los parrotales. Aliméntase d'artrópodos, granes y frutos. Habiten árees riques en vexetación arbustiva, como montes abiertos, ecotonos, chaparrales, carbes y tamién xardinos de ciudaes.

Notes

  1. Sada, Phillips y Ramos, 1984
  2. Arrascador Zarcero (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) (Linnaeus, 1758) en Avibase.

Referencies

Enllaces esternos

Protonotaria-citrea-002 edit.jpg Esta páxina forma parte del wikiproyeutu Aves, un esfuerciu collaborativu col fin d'ameyorar y organizar tolos conteníos rellacionaos con esti tema. Visita la páxina d'alderique del proyeutu pa collaborar y facer entrugues o suxerencies.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia AST

Pipilo erythrophthalmus: Brief Summary ( Asturian )

provided by wikipedia AST
Pipilo erythrophthalmus Map marker icon – Nicolas Mollet – Birds – Nature – white.png Les especies d'aves con nome común en llingua asturiana márquense como NOA. En casu contrariu, conséñase'l nome científicu o de la SEO.

'''Pipilo erythrophthalmus tamién denomináu arrascador pintu escuru, arrascador nororiental o ojirrojo, chingolo puntiáu y toquí pintu, ye una especie d'ave paseriforme de la familia de los emberízidos que vive n'América. La so taxonomía ye una tema aldericada en ornitoloxía, pos dalgunos consideren como una sola especie a una serie de poblaciones morfolóxicamente diverses ente sigo que se distribúin por América del Norte, Méxicu y Guatemala, ente qu'otres opiniones xulgar como 2, 3, o 4 especies distintes.

El presente artículu basar na llista d'aves de Sibley-Monroe, que toma en cuenta una sola especie. Pal casu d'Estaos Xuníos, la Unión d'Ornitólogos d'esi país reconoz dos especies: P. erythrophtalmus y P. maculatus, criteriu que sigue la Unión Internacional pal Caltenimientu de la Naturaleza. En Méxicu esisten dos variedaes autóctones, que suelen ser consideraes a nivel de subespecie o especie: P. (y.) macronyx y P. (y.) socorrensis.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia AST

Pinsà emmantellat ( Catalan; Valencian )

provided by wikipedia CA

El pinsà emmantellat[1] (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) és un ocell de la família dels emberízids (Emberizidae) que habita zones amb arbres d'Amèrica del Nord, des del sud de Canadà, cap al sud, a través dels Estats Units i les zones muntanyenques de Mèxic, fins a Guatemala.

Referències

 src= A Wikimedia Commons hi ha contingut multimèdia relatiu a: Pinsà emmantellat Modifica l'enllaç a Wikidata


license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autors i editors de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia CA

Pinsà emmantellat: Brief Summary ( Catalan; Valencian )

provided by wikipedia CA

El pinsà emmantellat (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) és un ocell de la família dels emberízids (Emberizidae) que habita zones amb arbres d'Amèrica del Nord, des del sud de Canadà, cap al sud, a través dels Estats Units i les zones muntanyenques de Mèxic, fins a Guatemala.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autors i editors de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia CA

Towhî ystlysgoch ( Welsh )

provided by wikipedia CY

Aderyn a rhywogaeth o adar yw Towhî ystlysgoch (sy'n enw gwrywaidd; enw lluosog: towhîod ystlysgoch) a adnabyddir hefyd gyda'i enw gwyddonol Pipilo erythrophthalmus; yr enw Saesneg arno yw Rufous-sided towhee. Mae'n perthyn i deulu'r Breision (Lladin: Emberizidae) sydd yn urdd y Passeriformes.[1]

Talfyrir yr enw Lladin yn aml yn P. erythrophthalmus, sef enw'r rhywogaeth.[2]

Teulu

Mae'r towhî ystlysgoch yn perthyn i deulu'r Breision (Lladin: Emberizidae). Dyma rai o aelodau eraill y teulu:

Rhestr Wicidata:

rhywogaeth enw tacson delwedd Bras adeingoch Peucaea carpalis Bras cynffon winau Peucaea sumichrasti
Aimophila sumichrasti.jpg
Pila brongoch y Dwyrain Loxigilla noctis
Loxigilla noctis a2.jpg
Pila coed cnocellaidd Camarhynchus pallidus
Camarhynchus pallidus composite.jpg
Pila coed mangrof Camarhynchus heliobates
Camarhynchus heliobates.png
Pila coed pryfysol bach Camarhynchus parvulus
Geospiza parvula.jpg
Pila coed pryfysol mawr Camarhynchus psittacula
Camarhynchus psittaculus1.jpg
Pila coed pryfysol Ynys Charles Camarhynchus pauper
MTF male.jpg
Pila inca adeinlwyd Incaspiza ortizi Pila inca bach Incaspiza watkinsi Pila inca cefngoch Incaspiza personata Pila inca ffrwynog Incaspiza laeta Twinc gwair Ciwba Tiaris canorus
Tiaris canorus -Canberra Walk In Aviary, Australia-8a.jpg
Twinc gwair wynebddu Tiaris bicolor
Black-faced grassquit (Tiaris bicolor) male.jpg
Yellow-faced grassquit Tiaris olivaceus
Yellow-faced-grassquit-eating-seeds.jpg
Diwedd y rhestr a gynhyrchwyd yn otomatig o Wicidata.

Gweler hefyd

Cyfeiriadau

  1. Gwefan Cymdeithas Edward Llwyd; adalwyd 30 Medi 2016.
  2. Gwefan Avibase; adalwyd 3 Hydref 2016.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Awduron a golygyddion Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia CY

Towhî ystlysgoch: Brief Summary ( Welsh )

provided by wikipedia CY

Aderyn a rhywogaeth o adar yw Towhî ystlysgoch (sy'n enw gwrywaidd; enw lluosog: towhîod ystlysgoch) a adnabyddir hefyd gyda'i enw gwyddonol Pipilo erythrophthalmus; yr enw Saesneg arno yw Rufous-sided towhee. Mae'n perthyn i deulu'r Breision (Lladin: Emberizidae) sydd yn urdd y Passeriformes.

Talfyrir yr enw Lladin yn aml yn P. erythrophthalmus, sef enw'r rhywogaeth.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Awduron a golygyddion Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia CY

Rötelgrundammer ( German )

provided by wikipedia DE

Die Rötelgrundammer (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) ist ein amerikanischer Singvogel aus der Familie der Neuweltammern.

Merkmale

Mit 23 cm Länge zählt die Rötelgrundammer zu den größten Neuweltsperlingen. Der Vogel hat rotbraune Flanken, einen weißen Bauch und einen langen dunklen Schwanz mit weißen Rändern. Die Augenfarbe ist im Allgemeinen rot, nur bei der südöstlichen Population ist sie weiß. Das Männchen ist an Kopf, Oberseite und Schwanz schwarz gefärbt, beim Weibchen sind diese Teile braun.

Vorkommen

Die Rötelgrundammer lebt in offenen Feldern, Dickichten, Busch- und Waldrändern vom Süden Kanadas über die USA bis nach Mexiko. Die nördlichen Populationen verbringen den Winter im südlichen Nordamerika.

Lebensweise

Der Vogel scharrt mit den Füßen am Boden zwischen Erdreich und Blättern nach Insekten, Spinnen und Früchten.

Das Weibchen baut alleine ein schalenförmiges Nest aus Zweigen und Gräsern am Boden oder zwischen den unteren Ästen eines Busches. Das Gelege aus zwei bis sechs Eiern bebrütet es etwa zwei Wochen lang. Die Jungvögel werden von beiden Elternvögel zwei Wochen lang mit Futter versorgt. Die Jungvögel bleiben noch bis zum Sommerende bei den Eltern.

Literatur

Weblinks

 src=
– Album mit Bildern, Videos und Audiodateien
 title=
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autoren und Herausgeber von Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia DE

Rötelgrundammer: Brief Summary ( German )

provided by wikipedia DE

Die Rötelgrundammer (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) ist ein amerikanischer Singvogel aus der Familie der Neuweltammern.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autoren und Herausgeber von Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia DE

Eastern towhee

provided by wikipedia EN

The eastern towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) is a large New World sparrow. The taxonomy of the towhees has been under debate in recent decades, and formerly this bird and the spotted towhee were considered a single species, the rufous-sided towhee.

Their breeding habitat is brushy areas across eastern North America. They nest either low in bushes or on the ground under shrubs. Northern birds migrate to the southern United States. There has been one record of this species as a vagrant to western Europe: a single bird in Great Britain in 1966.

The song is a short drink your teeeeea lasting around one second, starting with a sharp call ("drink!") and ending with a short trill "teeeeea". The name "towhee" is onomatopoeic description of one of the towhee's most common calls, a short two-part call rising in pitch and sometimes also called a "chewink" call.[2]

Taxonomy

The eastern towhee was described by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in 1758 in the tenth edition of his Systema Naturae and given the binomial name Fringilla erythrophthalma.[3] This species is now placed in the genus Pipilo that was introduced by the French ornithologist Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot in 1816.[4] The specific name erythrophthalmus/erythrophthalma combines the Ancient Greek words ερυθρος eruthros "red" and οφθαλμος ophthalmos "eye".[5]

Four subspecies are recognised:[6]

  • P. e. erythrophalmus (Linnaeus, 1758), found south-central and southeast Canada to the eastern United States
  • P. e. canaster (Howell, AH, 1913), found in the interior southeast United States
  • P. e. rileyi (Koelz, 1939), found in the coastal southeast United States except for central and southern Florida
  • P. e. alleni (Coues, 1871) found in south and central Florida

Description

The eastern towhee is a large and striking species of sparrow. The total length ranges from 17.3 to 23 cm (6.8 to 9.1 in) and the wingspan is 20–30 cm (7.9–11.8 in).[7][8] The body of mass of this species ranges from 32 to 53 g (1.1 to 1.9 oz), with an average of 40 g (1.4 oz).[9] Adults have rufous sides, a white belly, and a long dark tail with white edges. The eyes are red, white for birds in the southeast. Males have a black head, upper body, and tail; these parts are brown in the female. Juveniles are brown overall. Eastern towhees of all ages and both sexes generally are unmistakable and are not known to co-exist with the similar western spotted towhee.

Distribution

The eastern towhee occurs throughout the eastern United States and southeast Canada. Occurrences from southern Saskatchewan, southwest Ontario and Quebec south to Florida, and west to eastern Texas are noted in a literature review. Populations north of southern New England through northern Indiana and Illinois to southern Iowa primarily are summer residents.[2]

Pipilo e. erythrophthalmus occurs in the most northerly part of the eastern towhee's distribution in the summer, and in winter migrates to the southern and eastern portion of the range of the species. The other subspecies are largely residents.[10] Pipilo e. canaster occurs from south-central Louisiana, north to northeastern Louisiana east through Mississippi, extreme southwestern Tennessee, northern Alabama and Georgia, central South Carolina to western North Carolina, and south to northwestern Florida and east along the Gulf Coast.[11] The range of P. e. rileyi extends from northern Florida through southern Georgia and coastal South Carolina to east-central North Carolina. Pipilo e. alleni occurs in peninsular Florida.[10]

The eastern towhee occurs in vegetation of disturbed areas, such as old-field successional vegetation and shrubby areas of power line right-of-ways. In northwestern Arkansas, eastern towhees occurred in old-field vegetation where dwarf sumac (Rhus copallina) occurred at a frequency of 28.6%, winged elm (Ulmus alata) at a frequency of 21%, and black cherry (Prunus serotina) at a frequency of 19.2%.[12] Shrubby vegetation along power lines is commonly used by eastern towhees.[13] For example, in Maryland, eastern towhee territories along a power line right-of-way corresponded with shrubby areas containing species such as Allegheny blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis) and blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Other species included hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), red maple (Acer rubrum), black cherry, and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia).[13]

From 1966 to 2015 the eastern towhee experienced a greater than 1.5% annual population decrease throughout the Atlantic seaboard and the northern part of its breeding range.[14]

Timing of major life events

Female

Arrival and departure of eastern towhees into summer breeding grounds varies with location. According to a literature review, eastern towhees typically arrive in New York in early April and leave by the middle of November. A review of eastern towhees in New Hampshire describes arrival in late April to May with the majority departing in September.[15] Further south, on the border of Tennessee and North Carolina, migration to high-elevation areas within the Great Smoky Mountains begins as early as March. Eastern towhees typically leave these sites in October.[16] The Pipilo e. erythrophthalmus subspecies is the most migratory of the subspecies.[10]

Breeding begins in spring and continues to late summer. Reports of eastern towhees nesting as early as late March in Florida and Georgia, in mid- to late April in some midwestern states, and as late as mid-May in northern New England were summarized in a literature review.[2] Literature reviews also report nest construction by the female, which takes about three to five days.[2][15] Egg laying typically occurs until August. For example, a review of eastern towhees in Indiana notes nesting from 15 April to 20 August.[17] However, a literature review of eastern towhees in Florida included a report of a nest observed on 2 September 1983 that contained two eggs.[18] According to several literature reviews, eastern towhees may renest after failed nesting attempts and can raise two, and in the south sometimes three, broods per season.[2][15][18]

In a literature review, Greenlaw [2] reports mean breeding territory size of 4 acres (1.6 hectares) (range 1.6–6 acres (0.65–2.43 ha), n=24) in a mesic oak (Quercus species) forest where eastern towhees occurred at a density of 21 males/40 ha. In a xeric pine (Pinus species)-oak woodland where the eastern towhee density was 32 males/40 ha, mean eastern towhee territory size was 3 acres (1.2 hectares) (range 1.8–4 acres (0.73–1.62 ha), n=20).[2] In Massachusetts, mean male eastern towhee territory size was about 1.3 acres (0.53 hectares), and female eastern towhee territory size was 1.1 acres (0.45 hectares). Territory size changed over the course of the breeding season and was not significantly (p>0.05) affected by reductions in food availability of 30% or less. During the winter eastern towhees are not as territorial and may be seen in mixed species flocks.[2] Daily movement of eastern towhees in loblolly (P. taeda) and longleaf pine (P. palustris) forests and clearcuts in South Carolina averaged 325 feet (99 m) per day. Only 2 females, out of 11 females and 9 males, stayed within the stand where they were captured for the duration of a 10-week study.[19]

Eastern towhees have fairly strong fidelity to breeding territories. In an oak forest in New Jersey, adult eastern towhee return rates were 20% the 1st year after banding and 43% in subsequent years. Between 1960 and 1967, the maximum number of eastern towhee returns to the site was 5.[20] In a Pennsylvania woodlot observed between 1962 and 1967, an eastern towhee returned to the site for 4 consecutive years.[21]

Several reviews report eastern towhee clutch sizes from 2 to 6 eggs, with means ranging from 2.45 to 3.6 eggs per nest.[2][15][17][18] All 5 eastern towhee nests on Sanibel Island, Florida, contained 3 eggs.[22] Eastern towhees in 2 pitch pine (P. rigida) barrens sites in New Jersey and New York had a later median egg laying date (mid-June) and significantly (p<0.05) smaller average early nest clutch sizes (NJ=2.67, NY=3.25) than those in an oak-hickory (Carya spp.) site, which had a median egg-laying date in early June and an average early nest clutch size of 3.88. Food availability likely explains at least some of the differences between the 2 habitat types. Eggs are incubated by the female for 12 or 13 days. After hatching both parents feed the young, which fledge 10 to 12 days later and are dependent on parental care for about another month.[2][15][17][18]

A wide range of eastern towhee nest success values have been reported. On Sanibel Island, 1 of the 5 eastern towhee nests observed was successful. In Louisiana, average daily nest success rate was 95.3% on a bottomland hardwood forest site. The same study found a 92.6% average daily nest success rate in a 6-year-old managed cottonwood (Populus spp.) plantation in Alabama. Average eastern towhee nest success across mixed bigtooth (P. grandidentata) and quaking aspen (P. tremuloides) stands of varying ages in Pennsylvania was 48.1%.[23] In South Carolina, only 1 of 10 nests was successful, and the mean daily nest survival rate was 62.9%. This low value was explained by high levels of predation. Due to lower nest success rates of Bachman's sparrow (Aimophila aestivalis) than the previous year, it is suggested that eastern towhee nest success may have been measured during a comparatively poor year.[19]

Compared to nests, adult towhee survival rates are high. Average weekly adult survival rate of eastern towhees in a South Carolina study area was 99.3%. This rate was obtained from radio-marked eastern towhees and represented the pooled survival of both sexes and from 2 South Carolina sites, young and mature stands of loblolly and longleaf pine.[19] Between 1962 and 1967 in Pennsylvania, annual survival of breeding eastern towhees calculated from mistnetting recaptures was 58%.[21] According to a literature review, both males and females become reproductively mature in their second year.[2] Eastern towhees of over 12 years old have been reported in the wild.[24]

Preferred habitat

Eastern towhee singing in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge in New York

Eastern towhees range from near sea level to as high as 6,500 ft (2,000 m) along the border of Tennessee and North Carolina during the summer.[16] A literature review reports eastern towhees up to 3,000 ft (910 m) in New Hampshire.[15]

Eastern towhees spend the majority of their time near the ground. For instance, in Pennsylvania in spring, observations of eastern towhees below 3 ft (0.91 m) from the ground occurred significantly (p<0.05) more than expected based on random spatial distribution, and observations above 3 ft (0.91 m) occurred significantly (p<0.05) less than would be expected.[25] In a Louisiana bottomland forest 62% of eastern towhee observations were within 2 ft (0.61 m) of the ground, and only 4% were observed above 25 ft (7.6 m). In the spring this changed, with detections of eastern towhees below 25 ft (7.6 m) declining from 70% to 65% and detections in the canopy (>25 ft (7.6 m)) increasing from 4% to 7%.[26]

Eastern towhees occur in many habitats, from tallgrass prairies and marshes to mature forests.[19] However, eastern towhees are most common in early successional stands, habitat edges, and areas with similar vegetation structure throughout eastern forests.

In most communities eastern towhees are more abundant in young successional stands. Several studies found increased eastern towhee abundance on early successional sites compared to later-successional sites.[25][27][28][29] Mean number of breeding eastern towhees (0.70 bird/50-m radius) and nest success rate (58%) were higher in a 15-year-old clearcut in West Virginia, than in other treatments, including a stand of yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), black cherry, red maple, sugar maple (Acer saccharum), and white ash (Fraxinus americana) that was not harvested.[27] In a southern Missouri oak-hickory forest, eastern towhees were not present before clearcutting or in the nearby uncut forest after cutting, but occurred at a mean density of 9.3 birds/10 ha in a 3-year-old clearcut. A study of stands of varying ages in central New York found that eastern towhee density peaked in early successional stands.[28]

Although eastern towhees generally prefer young successional sites, variation between habitat types and years has been observed. Krementz and Powell [19] found higher relative abundance of eastern towhee in young (2–6 years old) stands of loblolly and longleaf pine than mature (32–98 years old) stands when investigated in 1995. However, in stands compared in 1996, the 95% confidence intervals of eastern towhee relative abundance on the 2 sites had a substantial degree of overlap. The degree to which eastern towhee responds to succession is influenced by habitat. For example, in Pennsylvania there was a significant (p<0.05) difference between eastern towhee densities (number/10 ha) between mature mixed-oak forest and stands that had been clearcut about 5 years previously. However, eastern towhee densities did not differ significantly between a 1-year old mixed aspen (Populus tremuloides, P. grandidentata) clearcut, a 5-year old aspen clearcut, and a mature aspen stand.[30] Eastern towhee abundance has been shown to peak at different times in different habitats. For instance, although in central hardwood forests eastern towhees were most abundant in regenerating stands, in loblolly and shortleaf pine forest they were most common in pole timber and mature stands. In addition, Bell and Whitmore concluded that early successional is likely too broad of a term for describing optimal towhee habitat, since high density of small trees was negatively associated with eastern towhee density in the eastern panhandle of West Virginia.[31]

Eastern towhees seem to prefer sites with characteristics generally associated with early successional vegetation, such as low canopy cover and dense understory. Negative correlations between eastern towhee abundance and various measurements of overstory density have been found in several studies.[12][30] Average density of eastern towhees across 6 habitat types in Pennsylvania was significantly (p<0.05) negatively correlated with density of overstory trees and basal area of overstory trees.[30] Number of eastern towhees in a western Virginia hardwood forest was also significantly (p<0.05) inversely correlated with total percent canopy cover. In a loblolly pine forest in South Carolina, the average number of eastern towhee breeding territories per experimental unit was significantly (p≤0.008) negatively correlated with mid-story (10–46 ft (3.0–14.0 m)) pine (Pinus spp.) and deciduous volume.[32]

Many studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between eastern towhee abundance and understory density. In a loblolly pine forest in South Carolina, understory (0–10 ft; 0.0–3.0 m) pine volume was significantly (p<0.001) positively correlated with the average number of eastern towhee territories per experimental unit.[32] Yahner [30] found the average density of eastern towhees over 6 habitat types was significantly (p<0.05) positively correlated with density of short (2–5-foot (0.5–1.5 m)) shrubs. In east-central Florida slash pine (P. elliottii) flatwoods with understories dominated by myrtle oak (Q. myrtifolia) and sand live oak (Q. geminata) and in scrub sites with scattered slash pine and cabbage palmetto (Sabal palmetto), eastern towhee densities were significantly (p=0.01) negatively correlated with mean shrub height.[33]

Eastern towhees may associate with and avoid certain plants. In Nevada, Towhees seem to prefer a habitat in which they are camouflaged such as flowering quince which matches their rufous coloration. In riparian vegetation in Iowa, eastern towhee density was significantly (p≤0.01) positively associated with total plant and vine species richness and negatively correlated with forb and deciduous tree species richness.[34] In West Virginia, eastern towhees were associated with plant species that occurred on drier ridgetops, such as blackberry (p<0.02), black cherry (p<0.002), and black locust (p<0.04). These sites tended to have open canopies and low tree density. Eastern towhee density was negatively associated with plants of the moister parts of this study area, such as black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica, p<0.006), red maple (p<0.001), and witch hazel (p<0.03).[31] In central New Jersey eastern towhees were significantly (p=0.03) more abundant in gray dogwood (Cornus racemosa) shrubland than either eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) or multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) shrublands.[35]

Nest with hatchlings in North Carolina

Nesting habitat: Eastern towhees typically nest on or near the ground. Several literature reviews note the predominance of eastern towhee nests below 5 feet (1.5 m).[2][15][17][18] In a study of cowbird parasitism on Sanibel Island, all 5 eastern towhee nests located were within 6 feet (1.8 m) of the ground.[22] Nests as high as 18 feet (5.5 m) have been reported in literature reviews.[2][15][17] Nests higher off the ground in mixed aspen stands of varying ages in Pennsylvania had significantly (p<0.001) lower nest success. Of 13 unsuccessful eastern towhee nests, 11 were greater than 1-foot (0.30 m) above the ground.[23]

In West Virginia, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences in habitat surrounding successful and unsuccessful nests. Large snags (≥9 inches diameter at breast height (≥22.9 cm)) did not have an effect on nesting success.[36] Nesting success was not significantly (p>0.05) affected by stand age or distance to edge in even-aged mixed-aspen stands in Pennsylvania.[23]

Eastern towhees nest in a variety of species including grape and blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). The majority of nests observed in South Carolina loblolly and longleaf pine forests and clearcuts were located in grape, tree sparkleberry (V. arboreum), and oak (Quercus spp.).[19] On an oak-hickory site in West Virginia, 27% of 41 eastern towhee nests were found in grape, 17% in blackberry (Rubus spp.), 12% in greenbrier (Smilax spp.), and 12% in mountain-laurel (Kalmia latifolia). Nests also occurred in Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), spice bush (Lindera benzoin), and azalea (Rhododendron spp.).[36] In a power line right-of-way in Pennsylvania, the 6 eastern towhee nests observed occurred in Allegheny blackberry, witch-hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), white oak (Q. alba), eastern hayscented fern (Dennstaedtia punctilobula) and sweetfern (Comptonia peregrina) combined, and on ground level. According to literature reviews, eastern towhee nests located on the ground are embedded in litter in dry areas and typically occur at the base of grasses, forbs, low shrubs, or small trees.[2][17]

Foraging habitat: Selection of foraging habitat by eastern towhees has been investigated in Massachusetts and New Jersey. When gleaning in a southeastern Massachusetts pitch pine barren, eastern towhees preferred species such as pitch pine, bear oak (Q. ilicifolia), and other deciduous trees, mainly oaks. Ericaceous species were avoided. Use differed significantly (p<0.001) from availability.[37] On 2 New Jersey sites, eastern towhee foraging preference switched over the course of the breeding season.[38] On a site dominated by oaks, primarily black oak (Q. velutina), eastern towhees used oaks in May, as would be expected due to their density. However, in June and July, as relative arthropod biomass declined in oaks, use of oaks was less than would be expected. On a pitch pine-dominated site, use of oaks (primarily bear oak and blackjack oak, Q. marilandica) was greater than would be expected in May, but was proportionate to availability in June and July. These negative correlations between date and oak use were significant (p<0.025) for both sites. Use of the oak-dominated site also decreased significantly (p<0.05) through the summer.[38]

Effects of spatial area: Eastern towhees appear to prefer edge habitats in many areas. For instance, the mean abundance of eastern towhees in a baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) in northern Florida was 18, while eastern towhees did not occur in either the baldcypress forest or the clearcut. At the interface of the baldcypress stand and a 13-year-old planted slash pine stand, mean abundance of eastern towhees was 22 breeding birds, while in the planted slash pine stand the average abundance was 15 breeding birds. Density of eastern towhees was found to decline with distance from the edge of a power line right-of-way and an oak-hickory forest in eastern Tennessee. At the edge, eastern towhees occurred at a density of just over 10 pairs/40 ha, while 197 feet (60 m) from the edge eastern towhee density had dropped to 1 pair/40 ha.[39] In addition, in experimentally clearcut Pennsylvanian forests composed of white oak, northern red oak (Q. rubra), chestnut oak (Q. prinus), scarlet oak (Q. coccinea), red maple, quaking aspen, bigtooth aspen, and pitch pine, male towhees were detected significantly (p<0.05) more often than expected in the areas where the spatial arrangement of clearcuts was most patchy.[40]

Several studies have addressed the effect of the size of habitat patches on eastern towhees. In mixed-oak forest in New Jersey, eastern towhee frequency generally increased with patch size, although eastern towhees were detected in all plot sizes (0.5–59 acres (0.20–23.88 ha)) except 0.02–acre (0.01 ha) plots. On a site in South Carolina, eastern towhee frequency of occurrence increased as clearcut size increased from <2.5 acres (1.0 hectare) to clearcut sizes from 21 to about 32 acres (8.5–12.8 ha). On another site eastern towhee frequency declined as clearcut size increased from 19 to 48 to 62 acres (7.7 to 19.4 to 25.1 ha).[29] Eastern towhees only bred in riparian vegetation patches in Iowa that were at least 650 feet (200 m) wide.[34] In southern and eastern Pennsylvania eastern towhee nest success was not significantly (p≥0.10) different on sites with gradual edges and those with more distinct edges between "wildlife habitat openings" and oak-hickory forest.[41]

Food habits

Eastern towhees primarily eat on the ground, although they also glean from vegetation. In a southeastern Massachusetts pitch pine barren, 73.5% of male and 80.4% of female foraging observations were on the ground.[37] When foraging on the ground eastern towhees use a scratching technique where both feet kick back simultaneously.[18] In a laboratory study 4 eastern towhees used this method to successfully obtain seed buried almost 1 inch (2.5 cm) deep. When foraging above ground the majority of time is spent gleaning foliage.[37] In Massachusetts, 22.5% of male and 16.3% of female foraging observations were of food being gleaned from foliage. Eastern towhees were also observed gleaning from twigs, branches, and trunks. When gleaning, eastern towhees occurred significantly (p<0.01) more often on the distal half of tree branches compared to using distal and proximal portions equally. In 0.5% of male and 0.3% of female foraging observations, eastern towhees hovered. Eastern towhees were never observed catching food out of the air.[37]

Eastern towhees eat a variety of plant and animal matter. In literature reviews, eastern towhees are reported to eat seeds and fruits, several invertebrates, and occasionally small amphibians, snakes, and lizards.[18] Reviews report eastern towhees foraging at feeders.[2] Reviews show that animal matter makes up a larger proportion of the diet in the breeding season.[2][42] In fall and winter, plants make up 79% and 85% of the diet, respectively. This drops to 53% in spring and 43% in summer.[42] Insects such as beetles (Coleoptera), grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera), ants, wasps, and bees (Hymenoptera), and moths and caterpillars (Lepidoptera) are common prey items. Eastern towhees eat other invertebrates such as spiders (Araneae), millipedes (Diplopoda), centipedes (Chilopoda), and snails (Gastropoda) to a lesser extent.[2][42] Plants that comprise at least 5% of the eastern towhee diet include ragweed (Ambrosia spp.), oak, smartweed (Polygonum spp.), and corn (Zea mays) in the Northeast and blackberry, oak, panicgrass (Panicum spp.), ragweed, and wax-myrtle (Morella cerifera) in the Southeast.[42]

Predators

Many animals prey on eastern towhees and their eggs, including reptiles, mammals, and birds. A literature review summarizes several reports demonstrating that predators are a major cause of nest failure.[2] The highest nest predation rate noted was 88% in a New York study. Mammals that are likely nest predators include northern raccoons (Procyon lotor), domestic cats (Felis catus), and eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus). Snakes such as bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer), rat snakes (Elaphe spp.) and garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.) have been reported eating eastern towhee eggs. Weasels (Mustela spp.) and blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) are also likely nest predators.[2] Several birds are known to prey on both young and adult eastern towhees, including northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), Broad-winged (Buteo platypterus), short-tailed (Buteo brachyurus), sharp-shinned (Accipiter striatus) and Cooper's hawks (Accipiter cooperii). Other predators include barred (Strix varia), short-eared (Asio flammeus) and eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio) and even the loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), which is scarcely larger than a towhee.[43][44][45] At least some mammals also feed on adult eastern towhees. In Maryland, an eastern towhee was found in the stomach contents of a red fox (Vulpes vulpes).[46]

Brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) parasitize eastern towhee nests. In a South Carolina old field, 5 of 19 eastern towhee nests were parasitized.[47] Each parasitized nest contained 1 Brown-headed Cowbird egg. The desertion rate for parasitized nests was 20%, which was similar to nests that had not been parasitized (21%). Two of the five Brown-headed Cowbird eggs produced fledglings. The study did not determine if there was a difference in nest success between parasitized and nonparasitized nests.[47] In West Virginia, only 3 of 41 eastern towhee nests were parasitized by the Brown-headed Cowbird. Average number of fledged young in nonparasitized nests was 2.8, which was similar to the average of 2.7 fledglings per parasitized nest.[36] In a Pennsylvania study site, only 2 of 36 nests were parasitized and both produced eastern towhee fledglings.[41] In a study of nest parasitism on Sanibel Island, none of 5 eastern towhee nests found were parasitized.[22]

References

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from Pipilo erythrophthalmus. United States Department of Agriculture.

  1. ^ BirdLife International (2016). "Pipilo erythrophthalmus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016: e.T22721310A94707703. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22721310A94707703.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Greenlaw, Jon S. (1996). Easter towhee – Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Poole, A.; Gill, F., eds. The birds of North America. No. 262: 1–32
  3. ^ Linnaeus, Carl (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (in Latin). Vol. 1 (10th ed.). Holmiae:Laurentii Salvii. p. 180.
  4. ^ Vieillot, Louis Jean Pierre (1816). Analyse d'une Nouvelle Ornithologie Élémentaire (in French). Paris: Deterville/self. p. 32.
  5. ^ Jobling, J.A. (2018). del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J.; Christie, D.A.; de Juana, E. (eds.). "Key to Scientific Names in Ornithology". Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions. Retrieved 7 July 2018.
  6. ^ "IOC World Bird List". www.worldbirdnames.org. Retrieved 2018-04-21.
  7. ^ Eastern Towhee, Life History, All About Birds – Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved on 2013-01-05.
  8. ^ Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Archived 2010-06-12 at the Wayback Machine. Georgia Museum of Natural History (2008). Retrieved on 2013-01-05.
  9. ^ CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses by John B. Dunning Jr. (Editor). CRC Press (1992), ISBN 978-0849342585.
  10. ^ a b c National Geographic Society. (1999). Field guide to the birds of North America. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: The National Geographic Society ISBN 0792274512.
  11. ^ American Ornithologists' Union. (1957). Checklist of North American birds. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Lord Baltimore Press, Inc.
  12. ^ a b Bay, Michael Daymon. (1994). Effects of area and vegetation on breeding bird communities in early successional oldfields. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas. Dissertation.
  13. ^ a b Gates, J. Edward; Dixon, Kenneth R. (1981). "Right-of-way utilization by forest- and corridor-breeding bird populations". In: Arner, Dale, ed. Environmental concerns in right-of-way management: Proceeding of 2nd symposium; 1979 October 16–18; Ann Arbor, MI. Special Study Project WS-78-141: 66–1 to 66–7
  14. ^ "Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus BBS Trend Map, 1966 - 2015". USGS. U.S. Department of the Interior. Retrieved 2020-12-16.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Foss, Carol R. (1994). Atlas of breeding birds in New Hampshire. Dover, NH: Audubon Society of New Hampshire ISBN 0752401025.
  16. ^ a b Stupka, Arthur. (1963). Notes on the birds of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee Press
  17. ^ a b c d e f Mumford, Russell E.; Keller, Charles E. (1984). The birds of Indiana. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press ISBN 0253107369.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Stevenson, Henry M.; Anderson, Bruce H. 1994. The birdlife of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press
  19. ^ a b c d e f Krementz, David G.; Powell, Larkin A. (2000). "Breeding season demography and movements of Eastern Towhees at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (2): 243–248. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0243:BSDAMO]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 55696042. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2010-07-25.
  20. ^ Leck, C; Murray, Bertram G.; Swinebroad, Jeff (1988). "Long-term changes in the breeding bird populations of a New Jersey forest". Biological Conservation. 46 (2): 145. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90097-3.
  21. ^ a b Savidge, Irvin R.; Davis, David E. (1974). "Survival of some common passerines in a Pennsylvania woodlot" (PDF). Bird-Banding. 45 (2): 152–155. doi:10.2307/4512023. JSTOR 4512023.
  22. ^ a b c Prather, John W.; Cruz, Alexander (2002). "Distribution, abundance, and breeding biology of potential cowbird hosts on Sanibel Island, Florida". Florida Field Naturalist. 30 (2): 21–76.
  23. ^ a b c Yahner, Richard H. (1991). "Avian nesting ecology in small even-aged aspen stands". Journal of Wildlife Management. 55 (1): 155–159. doi:10.2307/3809253. JSTOR 3809253.
  24. ^ Klimkiewicz, M. Kathleen; Futcher, Anthony G. (1987). "Longevity records of North American birds: Coerebinae through Estrildidae" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 58 (3): 318–333. JSTOR 4513247.
  25. ^ a b Yahner, Richard H. (1987). "Use of even-aged stands by winter and spring bird communities" (PDF). Wilson Bulletin. 99 (2): 218–232. JSTOR 4162381.
  26. ^ Dickson, James G.; Noble, Robert E. (1978). "Vertical distribution of birds in a Louisiana bottomland hardwood forest" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 90 (1): 19–30. JSTOR 4161021.
  27. ^ a b Duguay, Jeffrey P.; Wood, Petra Bohall; Nichols, Jeffrey V. (2001). "Songbird abundance and avian nest survival rates in forests fragmented by different silvicultural treatments". Conservation Biology. 15 (5): 1405–1415. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99023.x. JSTOR 3061496.
  28. ^ a b Keller, J; Richmond, M.E; Smith, C.R (2003). "An explanation of patterns of breeding bird species richness and density following clearcutting in northeastern USA forests". Forest Ecology and Management. 174 (1–3): 541. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00074-9.
  29. ^ a b Lanham, Joseph Drew. (1997). Attributes of avian communities in early-successional, clearcut habitats in the mountains and upper piedmont of South Carolina. Clemson, SC: Clemson University. Dissertation
  30. ^ a b c d Yahner, Richard H. (1986). "Structure, seasonal dynamics, and habitat relationships of avian communities in small even-aged forest stands" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 98 (1): 61–82. JSTOR 4162184.
  31. ^ a b Bell, Jennifer L.; Whitmore, Robert C. (1997). "Eastern towhee numbers increase following defoliation by gypsy moths" (PDF). The Auk. 114 (4): 708–716. doi:10.2307/4089290. JSTOR 4089290.
  32. ^ a b Lohr, Steven M.; Gauthreaux, Sidney A.; Kilgo, John C. (2002). "Importance of Coarse Woody Debris to Avian Communities in Loblolly Pine Forests". Conservation Biology. 16 (3): 767. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01019.x. S2CID 15428052.
  33. ^ Breininger, David R.; Smith, Rebecca B. (1992). "Relationships between fire and bird density in coastal scrub and slash pine flatwoods in Florida" (PDF). The American Midland Naturalist. 127 (2): 233–240. doi:10.2307/2426529. JSTOR 2426529.
  34. ^ a b Stauffer, Dean F.; Best, Louis B. (1980). "Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities: evaluation effects of habitat alterations". Journal of Wildlife Management. 44 (1): 1–15. doi:10.2307/3808345. JSTOR 3808345.
  35. ^ Suthers, Hannah B.; Bickal, Jean M.; Rodewald, Paul G. (2000). "Use of successional habitat and fruit resources by songbirds during autumn migration in central New Jersey". The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (2): 249–260. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0249:UOSHAF]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 4164202. S2CID 54809281.
  36. ^ a b c Bell, Jennifer L.; Whitmore, Robert C. (2000). "Bird nesting ecology in a forest defoliated by gypsy moths". The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (4): 524–531. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0524:BNEIAF]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 4164273. S2CID 86342106.
  37. ^ a b c d Morimoto, David C.; Wasserman, Fred E. (1991). "Intersexual and interspecific differences in the foraging behavior of rufous-sided towhees, common yellowthroats and prairie warblers in the pine barrens of southeastern Massachusetts" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 62 (4): 436–449. JSTOR 20065822.
  38. ^ a b Brush, Timothy; Stiles, Edmund W. (1990). "Habitat use by breeding birds in the New Jersey Pine Barrens". Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science. 35 (2): 13–16.
  39. ^ Kroodsma, Roger (1984). "Effect of edge on breeding forest bird species" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 93 (3): 426–436.
  40. ^ Lewis, Amy R.; Yahner, Richard H. (1999). "Sex-specific habitat use by Eastern Towhees in a managed forested landscape". Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science. 72 (2): 77–79. JSTOR 44149264.
  41. ^ a b Diefenbach, Duane R. (1996). Abundance and nest success of songbirds in simple and complex edge habitats. Final Report Project 06510. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Game Commission
  42. ^ a b c d Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. (1951). American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Bood Company, Inc.
  43. ^ Ogden, John C. (1974). "The Short-Tailed Hawk in Florida: I. Migration, Habitat, Hunting Techniques, and Food Habits". The Auk. 91 (1): 95–110. doi:10.2307/4084665. JSTOR 4084665.
  44. ^ Storer, Robert W. (1966). "Sexual Dimorphism and Food Habits in Three North American Accipiters". The Auk. 83 (3): 423–436. doi:10.2307/4083053. JSTOR 4083053.
  45. ^ Cumming, F. (1951). "Towhee is shrike's prey". Migrant. 22: 44.
  46. ^ Hockman, J. Gregory; Chapman, Joseph A. (1983). "Comparative feeding habits of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Maryland". The American Midland Naturalist. 110 (2): 276–285. doi:10.2307/2425269. JSTOR 2425269.
  47. ^ a b Whitehead, Maria A.; Schweitzer, Sara H.; Post, William (2002). "Cowbird/host interaction in a southeastern old-field: a recent contact area?". Journal of Field Ornithology. 73 (4): 379–386. doi:10.1648/0273-8570-73.4.379. S2CID 86231361.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Eastern towhee: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The eastern towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) is a large New World sparrow. The taxonomy of the towhees has been under debate in recent decades, and formerly this bird and the spotted towhee were considered a single species, the rufous-sided towhee.

Their breeding habitat is brushy areas across eastern North America. They nest either low in bushes or on the ground under shrubs. Northern birds migrate to the southern United States. There has been one record of this species as a vagrant to western Europe: a single bird in Great Britain in 1966.

The song is a short drink your teeeeea lasting around one second, starting with a sharp call ("drink!") and ending with a short trill "teeeeea". The name "towhee" is onomatopoeic description of one of the towhee's most common calls, a short two-part call rising in pitch and sometimes also called a "chewink" call.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Ruĝokula pipilo ( Esperanto )

provided by wikipedia EO

La Ruĝokula pipiloOrienta pipilo, Pipilo erythrophthalmus, estas granda specio de birdoj de la familio de Emberizedoj kaj amerika genro de Pipiloj, kiu enhavas pliajn 7 aŭ 8 speciojn. La taksonomio de la pipiloj estis ĵus pridisputata en la lastaj jardekoj, kaj iam tiu birdo kaj la proksima Makulpipilo estis konsiderataj ununura specio, nome Ruĝecflanka pipilo.

La birdospecia listo de Sibley-Monroe enkalkulas unusolan specion. Ĉe Usono, la American Ornithologists' Union agnoskas du speciojn: P. erythrophtalmus kaj P. maculatus, kriterio sekvata de la Internacia Unio por la Konservado de la Naturo. En Meksiko ekzistas du indiĝenaj variantoj, kiuj kutime estas konsiderataj kiel subspecioj aŭ specioj nome: P. (e.) macronyx kaj P. (e.) socorrensis.

Aspekto

 src=
Ino de la grupo erythrophthalmus.

Tiuj nearktisaj birdoj estas 18 al 21 cm longaj. Plenkreskuloj havas ruĝecajn aŭ cinamobrunajn flankojn, tre blankan ventron kaj longan malhelan voston kun blankaj bordoj. La okuloj estas ruĝaj (kio nomigas la specion kaj en la komuna nomo kaj en la latina scienca nomo kie erythrophthalmus estas kunmetaĵo de du radikoj el la antikva greka signife respektive “ruĝa” kaj “okulo”, sed estas blankaj ĉe la sudorientaj birdoj. Maskloj havas malhelajn (nigrecajn al malhelbrunajn) kapon, supran bruston, suprajn partojn kaj voston (kun kelkaj blankaj makuloj en flugiloj); tiuj partoj estas iom pli helaj, tio estas brunaj, ĉe inoj. Estas iome da seksa duformismo.

La alvoko estas trenata fajfo.

Gnome-speakernotes.svg
Ruĝokula pipilo

Ĉu problemoj aŭdigi ĉi tiun dosieron? Vidu helpon.

Similaj formoj

Peterson kaj Chalif distingas kvar morfojn, kiuj povus esti ĉu subspecioj aŭ specioj:

1) Ruĝokula pipilo (grupo erythrophthalmus). La dorsaj partoj estas nigraj al malhelbrunaj, kun kelkaj blankaj makuloj en flugiloj sed ne en dorso. Loĝas en orienta Usono.

2) La Makulpipilo (grupo maculatus). Kun dorsaj partoj nigraj al malhelbrunaj, kun kelkaj blankaj makuloj en flugiloj kaj en dorso. Okcidenta Nordameriko, Meksiko kaj Gvatemalo.

3) Olivdorsa pipilo (grupo macronyx). Kun dorsaj partoj olivecbrunaj, kun klaraj blankaj makuloj en flugiloj kaj en dorso. Centro de Meksiko.

4) La Sokora pipilo (grupo socorrensis). Pli malgranda ol la aliaj. Kun grizaj dorsaj partoj, kun pli helaj makuloj en dorso. Insulo Socorro (Meksiko).

La American Ornithologists' Union agnoskas du speciojn, nome la Ruĝokula pipilo (P. erythrophthalmus) kaj la okcidenta (P. maculatus), kaj ene de tiu lasta inkludas la morfojn de Socorro kaj de la centro de Meksiko. Tamen la populacio de Socorro estas plej ofte konsiderata distinga specio.

La tri kontinentaj morfoj kapablas interreproduktiĝi. La morfo maculatus koincidas en distribuado kun la aliaj du. Krome tiu morfo hibridas en Meksiko kun la Kolumpipilo (Pipilo ocai).

Distribuado

Ties reprodukta biotopo estas arbustecaj areoj de orienta Nordameriko. Ili nestumas ĉu malalte en arbustoj aŭ surgrunde sub tiuj. Nordaj birdoj migras al suda Usono. Estas unu vidaĵo de tiu specio kiel vaganto en okcidenta Eŭropo; ununura birdo en Britio en 1966.[1]

La Ruĝokula pipilo loĝas tra orienta Usono. Oni konstatis loĝadojn el suda Saskaĉevano kaj Kebekio suden al Florido, kaj okcidente al orienta Teksaso en literatura studado. Populacioj norde de suda Novanglio tra norda Indiano kaj Ilinoiso al suda Iovao estas ĉefe someraj loĝantoj.[2]

Pipilo e. erythrophthalmus loĝas en plej norda parto de la distribuado de la Ruĝokula pipilo en somero, kaj migras al suda kaj orienta parto de la teritorio de la specio vintre. La aliaj subspecioj estas ege de loĝantaj birdoj [3]. Pipilo e. canaster loĝas el sudcentra Luiziano, norde al nordorienta Luiziano orienten tra Misisipio, pleja sudokcidenta Tenesio, norda Alabamo kaj Georgio, centra Sudkarolino al okcidenta Nordkarolino, kaj suden al nordokcidenta Florido kaj orienten laŭlonge de la marbordo de la Golfo de Meksiko.[4] La teritorio de P. e. rileyi etendas el norda Florido tra suda Georgio kaj marborda Sudkarolino al centrorienta Nordkarolino. Pipilo e. alleni loĝas en duoninsula Florido [3].

La Ruĝokula pipilo loĝas en vegetejoj de netrankvilaj areoj, kiaj malnova kamparo kaj arbustecaj areoj ĉe elektraj fostoj. En nordokcidenta Arkansaso, la Ruĝokula pipilo loĝas en malnovaj kamparoj kie estas dwarf sumac (Rhus copallina) kun proporcio de 28.6 %, flugilulmo (Ulmus alata) kun proporcio de 21%, kaj malfrua prunuso (Prunus serotina) kun proporcio de 19.2% [5]. Arbustecaj vegetaĵaroj laŭlonge de elektraj fostoj estas komune uzataj de la Ruĝokula pipilo [6]. Ekzemple en Marilando, la teritorioj de la Ruĝokula pipilo laŭlonge de elektraj fostoj korespondis kun arbustecaj areoj enhavantaj speciojn kiaj Alegana rubuso (Rubus allegheniensis) kaj vakcinio (Vaccinium spp.). Aliaj specioj estis kratago (Crataegus spp.), ruĝa acero (Acer rubrum), malfrua prunuso, kaj ŝajnakacia robinio (Robinia pseudoacacia) [6].

Biologia tempo

Alveno kaj foriro de Ruĝokula pipilo al kaj el la somerejoj varias laŭloke. Laŭ literatura pristudo, la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj tipe alvenas al Novjorkio komence de aprilo kaj foriras meze de novembro. Studo pri Ruĝokula pipilo en Nov-Hampŝiro priskribas alvenon fine de aprilo al majo kun majoritato de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj forirantaj septembre [7]. Pli sude, en limo de Tenesio kaj Nordkarolino, migrado al altaltitudaj areoj de la Great Smoky Mountains ekas tiom frue kiom marte. Ruĝokulaj pipiloj tipe forlasas tiujn lokojn oktobre [8]. La subspecio Pipilo e. erythrophthalmus estas la plej migranta de la subspecioj [3].

Reproduktado komencas printempe kaj daŭras al fino de somero. En studoj aperas informoj pri Ruĝokulaj pipiloj nestumantaj tiom frue kiom fine de marto en Florido kaj Georgio, en meza al fina aprilo en kelkaj mezokcidentaj subŝtatoj, kaj tiom malfrue kiom meze de majo en norda Novanglio [2]. Oni informis ankaŭ pri nestokonstruado fare de la ino, kio daŭras 3 al 5 tagojn [2][7]. Ovodemetado tipe okazas ĝis aŭgusto. Ekzemple studo pri Ruĝokula pipilo en Indiano konstatis nestumadon el 15a de aprilo al 20a de aŭgusto [9]. Tamen pristudo de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en Florida inkludis informon pri nesto de Ruĝokula pipilo observata la 2an de septembro de 1983 kiu enhavis ankoraŭ 2 ovojn [10]. Laŭ kelkaj pristudoj la Ruĝokula pipilo povas fari duan ovodemetadon post malsukceson kaj povas fari 2, kaj sude foje 3, ovodemetadojn ĉiun sezonon [2][7][10].

Greenlaw [2] enkalkulas grandon de reproduktan teritorion je 1.6 ha en kverkarbaroj (Quercus spp.) kie Ruĝokulaj pipiloj loĝis je denseco de 21 maskloj/40 ha. En miksa arbaro de pino (Pinus spp.) kaj kverko kie Ruĝokula pipilo densis je 32 maskloj/40 ha, la teritorigrando estis 1.2 ha [2]. En Masaĉuseco la teritorio de la masklo de Ruĝokula pipilo estis de ĉirkaŭ 0.52 ha, kaj tiu de la ino de ĉ. 0.45 ha. Teritorigrando ŝanĝis laŭlonge de la reprodukta sezono kaj ne estis tre influita de la malpliiĝo de manĝodisponeblo en 30 % aŭ malpli. Dum vintro la Ruĝokula pipilo ne estas tiom teritoria kaj povas esti vidata en miksitaj kunmanĝantaroj [2]. La tagaj movoj de la Ruĝokula pipilo en arbaroj de torĉpino (Pinus taeda) kaj de longfolia pino (P. palustris) kaj ties klarejoj en Sudkarolino averaĝis 99 m tage. Nur 2 inoj el 11 inoj kaj 9 maskloj restis en la loko kiam ili estis kaptitaj por studo de 10 semajnoj [11].

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj havas fortan fidelecon al la reproduktaj teritorioj. En kverkarbaroj de Nov-Ĵerzejo, la indico de revenoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis 20 % la unuan jaron post la ringado kaj 43 % en venontaj jaroj. Inter 1960 kaj 1967, la maksimuma nombro de revenoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj al loko estis 5.[12] En Pensilvanio oni observis inter 1962 kaj 1967, Ruĝokulan pipilon kiu revenis al loko dum 4 sinsekvaj jaroj [13].

La ovaroj de la Ruĝokula pipilo estas de 2 al 6 ovoj, kun averaĝoj de po 2.45 al 3.6 ovoj en nesto [2][7][9][10]. Ĉiu 5a nesto de Ruĝokula pipilo en Insulo Sanibel, Florido, enhavis 3 ovojn [14]. Ruĝokula pipiloj de pinarbaroj (P. rigida) en Nov-Ĵerzejo kaj Novjorkio havis en malfruaj juniaj nestoj (p<0.05) pli malgrandan averaĝon (NJ=2.67, NY=3.25) ol tiuj de arbaroj de kverko-karjo (Carya spp.), kiu havis mezan ovonombron de 3.88. Ŝajne manĝodisponeblo eksplikas almenaŭ kelkajn el la diferencoj inter la 2 biotopotipoj.

Kovado estas farata nur de la ino dum 12 aŭ 13 tagoj. Post eloviĝo ambaŭ gepatroj zorgas la idojn, kaj elnestiĝo okazas post kromaj 10 aŭ 12 tagoj kaj la idoj ankoraŭ dependas el patra zorgo dum plua monato [2][7][9][10].

Oni studis la nestosukceson de la Ruĝokula pipilo. En la Insulo Sanibel, 1 el 5 nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo observataj estis sukcesaj. En Luiziano, averaĝa nestosukceso estis de 95.3 % en arbara biotopo. La sama studo trovis 92.6 % de averaĝa nestosukceso en 6-jara kotonarbaro (Populus spp.) de Alabamo. Averaĝa nestosukceso de Ruĝokula pipilo en miksita arbaro de grandadenta poplo (P. grandidentata) kaj ŝajntremola poplo (P. tremuloides) de diversa aĝo en Pensilvanio estis de 48.1 % [15]. En Sudkarolino nur 1 el 10 nestoj estis sukcesa kaj la survivindico de idoj estis de 62.9 %. Tiu malalta indico estis klarigita de altaj niveloj de predado. Pro plimalaltaj nestosukcesoj de la Baĉmana pasero (Aimophila aestivalis) ol la antaŭa jaro, oni sugestis, ke la nestosukceso de Ruĝokula pipilo povus esti mezurata dum kompare malbona jaro [11].

Kompare al nestoj, la survivindicoj de plenkreskuloj de Ruĝokula pipilo estas altaj. Averaĝa semajna survivindico de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en studo de areo de Sudkarolino estis 99.3 %. Tiu indico estis akirita el radimarkataj Ruĝokulaj pipiloj kaj reprezentis la survivadon de ambaŭ seksoj [11]. Inter 1962 kaj 1967 en Pensilvanio, jara survivado de reproduktantaj Ruĝokulaj pipiloj kalkuliĝis el perretaj rekaptaĵoj je 58 % [13]. Laŭ iu studo kaj maskloj kaj inoj iĝas reprodukte maturaj en sia 2a jaro [2]. Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ĉirkaŭ 12jaraj estis konstatitaj en naturo [16].

Preferata vivejo

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj loĝas el marnivelo al 1,980 m super marnivelo laŭlonge de la bordo de Tenesio kaj Nordkarolino dum somero [8]. Studo konstatis Ruĝokulajn pipilojn tiom alte kiom ĝis 900 m en Nov-Hampŝiro [7].

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj pasas majoritaton de sia tempo ĉegrunde. Ekzemple en Pensilvanio printempe oni observis Ruĝokulajn pipilojn malpli je 1 m el grundo sufiĉe ofte (p<0.05) pli ol espereble baze sur hazarda spaca distribuado, kaj observoj super 1 m okazis (p<0.05) ege malpli ol espereble [17]. En arbaro de Luiziano 62 % de la observoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj okazis je 0.6 m el grundo, kaj nur 4 % estis observataj super 7.6 m. Printempe tio ŝanĝis, kun detektoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj sub 7.6 m malpliiĝante el 70 % al 65 % kaj detektoj en kanopeo (>7.6 m) pliiĝante el 4 % al 7 %.[18]

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj loĝas en multaj biotopoj, el altaherbaj prerioj kaj marĉoj al maturaj arbaroj [11]. Tamen, Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estas plej komunaj en frue sukcedaj arbareroj, biotopobordoj kaj areoj kun simila vegetaĵara strukturo tra orientaj arbaroj.

En plej parto de komunumoj la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estas pli abundaj en junaj sukcedaj arbareroj. Kelkaj studoj trovis pliiĝantan abundon de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en frue sukcedaj arbareroj kompare kun malfrue sukcedaj arbareroj [17][19][20][21]. Nombro de reproduktantaj Ruĝokulaj pipiloj (0.70 birdo/50-m radiuso) kaj indicoj de nestosukceso (58 %) estis pli altaj en 15-jara klarejo en Okcidenta Virginio, ol en aliaj lokoj, inklude arbareron de tulipa liriodendro (Liriodendron tulipifera), nigra prunuso, ruĝa acero, sukeracero (Acer saccharum), kaj blanka frakseno (Fraxinus americana) kiu ne estis rekolektita [19]. En suda arbaro de kverko-karjo de Misurio, la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj forestis antaŭ klarigado aŭ el proksimaj nefortranĉitaj arbaroj post fortranĉado, sed loĝis en averaĝa denseco de 9.3 birdoj/10 ha en 3-jara klarejo. Studo de arbareroj de diversaj aĝoj en centra Novjorkio trovis, ke la denseco de Ruĝokula pipilo plialtiĝis en frue sukcedaj arbareroj [20].

Kvankam Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ĝenerale preferas junajn sukcedajn arbarerojn, oni observis variadon inter biotopotipoj kaj jaroj. Krementz kaj Powell [11] trovis pli altan relativan abundon de Ruĝokula pipilo en junaj (2–6 jaraj) arbareroj de loblolly kaj longfolia pino ol ĉe maturaj lokoj (32–98 jaraj) kiam oni faris la studon en 1995. Tamen en lokoj kompare en 1996, la fidaj intermezoj je 95 % de relativa abundo de Ruĝokula pipilo en la 2 lokoj havis gravan gradon de koincido. La grado laŭ kiu la Ruĝokula pipilo reagas al sukcedo estas influata de la vivejo. Ekzemple en Pensilvanio estis grava diferenco (p<0.05) inter densecoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj (nombro/10 ha) inter maturaj arbaroj miksitaj kun kverkoj kaj arbareroj kiuj estis klarigitaj antaŭ ĉirkaŭ 5 jaroj. Tamen la densecoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ne diferencas grave inter 1-jara miksita klarejo de poploj (Populus tremuloides, P. grandidentata), 5-jara klarejo de poplo kaj matura klarejo de poplo [22]. La abundo de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj plialtiĝis je diferencaj epokoj en diferencaj vivejoj. Ekzemple kvankam en centraj durlignaj arbaroj Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis pli abundaj en regenerataj arbareroj, en arbaroj de loblolly kaj longfolia pino ili estis plej komunaj en fostolignaj kaj maturaj arbareroj. Krome Bell kaj Whitmore konkludis, ke frue sukcedaj arbareroj estas probable tro ampleksaj por konsistigi bonegan habitaton por Ruĝokulaj pipiloj, ĉar alta denseco de malgrandaj arboj estis negative asocia kun denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en la orienta zono de Okcidenta Virginio [23].

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ŝajne preferas lokojn kun karakteroj ĝenerale asociaj kun frue sukceda vegetaĵaro, kiaj malalta kanopeo kaj densa subkreskaĵaro. Negativa rilataro inter abundo de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj kaj diversaj mezuroj de denseco de subkreskaĵaro troviĝis en kelkaj studoj [5][22]. Averaĝa denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en 6 habitatotipoj en Pensilvanio estis grave (p<0.05) negative rilata al denseco de subkreskaĵaro kaj al baza areo de subkreskaĵaraj arboj [22]. Nombro de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en durligna arbaro de okcidenta Virginio estis ankaŭ grava (p<0.05) inverse rilata al totala pocenta kanopeo. En pinarbaro de loblolly en Sudkarolino, la averaĝa nombro de reproduktaj teritorioj de Ruĝokula pipilo por eksperimenta unuo estis grave (p≤0.008) negative rilata kun meza kreskaĵaro (3–14 m) de pino (Pinus spp.) kaj decidua volumo [24].

Multaj studoj montris pozitivan rilaton inter abundo de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj kaj subkreskaĵara denseco. En pinarbaroj de loblolly en Sudkarolino, la volumo de pina subkreskaĵaro (0–3 m) estis grave (p<0.001) pozitive rilata kun averaĝa nombro de la teritorioj de Ruĝokula pipilo por eksperimenta unuo [24]. Yahner [22] trovis, ke averaĝa denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en 6 habitatotipoj estis grave (p<0.05) pozitive rilata kun denseco de malaltaj arbustoj (0.5–1.5 m). En centrorienta Florido arbaroj de eliota pino (P. elliottii) kun subkreskaĵaro hegemonia fare de mirtofolia kverko (Q. myrtifolia) kaj de sablokverko (Q. geminata) kaj en arbustaroj kun disaj eliotaj pinoj kaj palmetopalmo (Sabal palmetto), la densecoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis grave (p=0.01) negative rilataj al alteco de arbustoj [25].

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj povas asociiĝi kun aŭ eviti iajn plantojn. En ĉerivera vegetaĵaro en Iovao, la denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis grave (p≤0.01) pozitive asocia kun totala riĉo de plantoj kaj vitejoj kaj negative rilata kun riĉo de florherbaj plantoj kaj deciduaj arbospecioj [26]. En Okcidenta Virginio, Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis asociaj kun plantoj kiuj loĝas en pli sekaj altaĵoj, kiaj rubusoj (p<0.02), nigra prunuso (p<0.002), kaj nigra robinio (p<0.04). Tiuj lokoj tendencis havi malfermajn kanopeojn kaj malaltan arbodensecon. La denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis negative asocia kun plantoj de plej humidaj partoj de tiu studata areo, kiaj nigra tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica, p<0.006), ruĝa acero (p<0.001), kaj hamamelo (p<0.03).[23] En centra Nov-Ĵerzejo Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis grave (p=0.03) pli abundaj en arbustaroj de griza kornuso (Cornus racemosa) ol en tiuj de virginia junipero (Juniperus virginiana) aŭ multiflora rozo (Rosa multiflora)[27].

Nestovivejo: Ruĝokulaj pipiloj tipe nestumas sur aŭ ĉe grundo. Kelkaj studoj montras la hegemonion de nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo je 1.5 m [2][7][9][10]. En studo de molotra parazitado en Insulo Sanibel, ĉiuj 5 nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo lokigitaj estis je 2 m supergrunde [14]. Oni informis pri nestoj tiom altaj kiom ĝis 5.5 m [2][7][9]. Nestoj pli altaj supergrunde en miksita arbaro de tremoloj de diversaj aĝoj en Pensilvanio grave (p<0.001) havis pli malaltan nestosukceson. El 13 nesukcesaj nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo, 11 estis pli da 0.5 m supergrunde.[15].

En Okcidenta Virginio, ne estis gravaj (p>0.05) diferencoj en biotopo ĉirkaŭ sukcesaj kaj nesukcesaj nestoj. Grandaj nestujoj (≥22.9 cm) ne havas efikon sur nestosukceso [28]. Nestosukceso ne estis grave (p>0.05) influata de aĝo de arbarero aŭ distanco al bordo en eĉ aĝaj miksitaj arbareroj de tremoloj en Pensilvanio.[15].

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj nestumas en vario de specioj inklude vitojn kaj vakciniojn (Vaccinium spp.). Majoritato de nestoj observataj en Sudkarolino nome en arbaroj kaj klarejoj de loblolly kaj longfolia pino situis en vito, aŭ arbovakcinioj (V. arboreum), kaj kverkoj (Quercus spp.) [11]. En loko de kverko-hikorio en Okcidenta Virginio, 27 % de 41 nestoj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj troviĝis en vitoj, 17 % en rubusoj (Rubus spp.), 12 % en greenbrier (Smilax spp.), kaj 12 % en montolaŭro (Kalmia latifolia). Nestoj estis ankaŭ en ampelopso (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), lindero (Lindera benzoin), kaj azaleo (Rhododendron spp.) [28]. En elektraj fostoj en Pensilvanio, la 6 nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo observataj estis en Alegenia rubuso, hamamelo (Hamamelis virginiana), vakcinio (Vaccinium spp.), blanka kverko (Q. alba), orienta fojnaroma filiko (Dennstaedtia punctilobula) kaj komptonio (Comptonia peregrina) kombine, kaj surgrunde. Laŭ kelkaj studoj nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo situaj surgrunde estas kaŝitaj inter rubaĵoj en sekaj areoj kaj tipe estas ĉe bazo de herboj, florherbaj plantoj, malaltaj arbustoj, aŭ malgrandaj arboj [2][9].

Manĝovivejo: Selekto de manĝohabitato de la Ruĝokula pipilo estis pristudata en Masaĉuseco kaj Nov-Ĵerzejo. Kiam ili rikoltas en pinarbaroj de sudorienta Masaĉuseco, la Ruĝokula pipilo preferas speciojn kiaj rigida pino, ursa kverko (Q. ilicifolia), kaj aliaj deciduaj arboj, ĉefe kverkoj. Erikacajn specioj oni evitas. Ties uzo diferencas grave (p<0.001) el disponeblo [29]. En 2 lokoj de Nov-Jerzejo, la manĝo prefero de la Ruĝokula pipilo ŝanĝis laŭ la fluo de la reprodukta sezono [30]. En loko kie hegemonias kverkoj, ĉefe nigra kverko (Q. velutina), Ruĝokulaj pipiloj uzis kverkojn maje, kiel espereble pri ties denseco. Tamen junie kaj julie, ĉar rilataj artropodoj malpliiĝis en kverkoj, la uzo de kverkoj estis malpli ol espereble. En loko kie hegemonias la rigida pino, la uzo de kverkoj (ĉefe ursa kverko kaj klabeta kverko (Q. marilandica)) estis pli granda ol espereble maje, sed estis proporcia al disponeblo en junio kaj julio. Tiuj negativaj rilatoj inter dato kaj kverkuzo estis grava (p<0.025) ĉe ambaŭ lokoj. Uzo de la loko kverkohegemonia ege malpliiĝis (p<0.05) dum somero.[30].

Efiko de la spaca areo: Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ŝajne preferas bordovivejojn en multaj areoj. Ekzemple la meza abundo de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj en arbaroj de marĉa taksodio (Taxodium distichum) en norda Florido estis 18, dum la Ruĝokula pipilo loĝas nek en arbaroj de marĉa taksodio nek en ties klarejoj. Je intermezo de marĉa taksodio kaj 13-jara arbarero de Eliot-pino, meza abundo de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis 22 reproduktantaj birdoj, dum en plantita arbarero de eliota pino la averaĝa abundo estis de 15 reproduktantaj birdoj. Oni trovis, ke denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj malpliiĝas laŭ distanco el bordo de elektra fosto kaj de arbarero de kverko-karjo en orienta Tenesio. Ĉe bordoj Ruĝokulaj pipiloj loĝas je denseco de ĝuste super 10 paroj/40 ha, dum je 60 m el bordoj la denseco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ege malpliiĝis al 1 paro/40 ha.[31] Krome, en eksperimentaj klarejoj de arbaroj de Pensilvanio komponitaj de blanka kverko, ruĝa kverko (Q. rubra), bruna kverko (Q. prinus), skarlata kverko (Q. coccinea), ruĝa acero, ŝajntremola poplo, grandadenta tremolo, kaj rigida pino, maskloj de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis ege detektitaj (p<0.05) pli ofte ol espereble en la areoj kie la spaca aranĝo de la klarejoj estis ĉefe ereca [32].

Oni faris kelkajn studojn pri la efiko de la grando de habitateroj sur la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj. En miksitaj arbaroj de kverkoj en Nov-Ĵerzejo, la frekvenco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ĝenerale pliiĝis laŭ la erogrando, kvankam oni detektis Ruĝokulajn pipilojn en ĉiaj erograndoj (0.2–24 ha) escepte eroj de 0.01 ha. En loko de Sudkarolino, la frekvenco de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj pliiĝis laŭ pliiĝis klareja grando el <1 ha al klareja grando de ĉirkaŭ 8.5–12.8 ha. Aliloke la frekvenco de Ruĝokula pipilo malpliiĝis dum la klarogrando pliiĝis el 7.6–13.2 ha al 19.5–25.2 ha [21]. Ruĝokula pipilos reproduktiĝas en ĉerivera vegetaĵareroj en Iovao kiuj estis almenaŭ ĉirkaŭ 200 m ampleksaj [26]. En suda kaj orienta Pensilvanio la nestosukceso de la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ne estis grave (p≥0.10) diferenca en lokoj kun gradaj bordoj kaj tiuj kun pli distingaj bordoj inter "malferma natura biotopo" kaj arbaroj de kverko-hikorio [33].

Manĝokutimaro

Ili serĉas nutradon surgrunde, inter seka subkreskaĵaro, aŭ inter arbustoj. Ili manĝas artropodojn, semojn kaj fruktojn.

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj manĝas ĉefe surgrunde, kvankam ili serĉas ankaŭ en vegetaĵaro. En arbaroj de rigida pino de sudorienta Masaĉuseco, 73.5 % de observoj de maskloj kaj 80.4 % de inoj okazis surgrunde [29]. Kiam manĝas surgrunde Ruĝokulaj pipiloj uzas skrapoteknikon kie ambaŭ piedoj reengratas samtempe [10]. En laboratoristudo 4 Ruĝokulaj pipiloj uzis tiun metodon por sukcese akiri semojn enterigitajn preskaŭ 2.25 cm profunde. Kiam ili manĝas supergrunde majoritato de la tempo pasiĝas per serĉado en foliaro [29]. En Masaĉuseco, 22.5% de manĝobservoj de maskloj kaj 16.3 % de inoj estis de manĝo serĉata inter foliaro. Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis observataj ankaŭ serĉantaj el bastonetoj, branĉoj, kaj trunkoj. Dum serĉado, la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estis grave (p<0.01) pli ofte sur la malproksima duono de arbobranĉoj kompare kun la uzado de malproksima kaj proksimaj partoj same. En 0.5 % de manĝobservoj de maskloj kaj 0.3 % de inoj, la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj ŝvebis. Neniam oni observis Ruĝokulajn pipilojn kaptante manĝon dumfluge [29].

Ruĝokulaj pipiloj manĝas varion de planta kaj animala materialoj. En koncernaj pristudoj oni informis, ke Ruĝokulaj pipiloj manĝas semojn kaj fruktojn, kelkajn senvertebrulojn, kaj foje malgrandajn amfibiojn, serpentojn kaj lacertojn [10]. Ankaŭ ke Ruĝokulaj pipiloj manĝas ĉe birdomanĝejoj [2]. Aliaj montras, ke animala materialo formas pli grandan proporcion de la dieto en la reprodukta sezono [2][34]. Aŭtune kaj vintre plantoj formas 79 % kaj 85 % de la dieto, respektive. Tio falas al 53 % printempe kaj al 43 % somere [34]. Insektoj kiaj skaraboj (Coleoptera), akridoj kaj griloj (Orthoptera), formikoj, vespoj kaj abeloj (Hymenoptera), kaj tineoj kaj raŭpoj (Lepidoptera) estas komunaj predaĵoj. Ruĝokulaj pipiloj manĝas aliajn senvertebrulojn kiaj araneoj (Araneae), milpieduloj (Diplopoda), centpieduloj (Chilopoda), kaj helikoj (Gastropoda) je malpli etendo [2][34]. Plantoj kiuj formas almenaŭ 5 % de la dieto de la Ruĝokulaj pipiloj estas ambrosio (Ambrosia spp.), kverkoj, poligono (Polygonum spp.), kaj maizo (Zea mays) en Nordoriento kaj rubusoj, kverkoj, panikoherbo (Panicum spp.), ambrosio, kaj miriko (Morella ceriferaMyrica cerifera) en Sudoriento [34].

Predantoj

Multaj animaloj predas Ruĝokulajn pipilojn kaj ties ovojn, inklude reptiliojn, mamulojn kaj birdojn. Pristudo resumas kelkajn informojn kiuj montras, ke predantoj estas plej grava tialo de reprodukta malsukceso [2]. La pleja alta indico de nestopredado notita estis 88 % en Novjorkia studo. Mamuloj kiuj estas nestopredantoj estas lavursoj (Procyon lotor), hejmaj katoj (Felis catus), kaj orientaj ĉipmunkoj (Tamias striatus). Oni scias, ke serpentoj kiaj taŭrserpentoj (Pituophis catenifer), ratserpentoj (Elaphe spp.) kaj tamnofioj (Thamnophis spp.) manĝas ovojn de Ruĝokulaj pipiloj. Musteloj (Mustela spp.) kaj ankaŭ la blua garolo (Cyanocitta cristata) estas nestopredantoj [2]. Oni scias, ke kelkaj birdoj predas plenkreskulojn de Ruĝokula pipilo, inklude Larĝavosta buteo (Buteo brachyurus), Striakcipitro (Accipiter striatus) kaj Koopera akcipitro (Accipiter cooperii). Ankaŭ almenaŭ kelkaj mamuloj manĝas plenkreskulojn de Ruĝokula pipilo. En Marilando, oni trovis Ruĝokulan pipilon en la stomaka enhavo de ruĝa vulpo (Vulpes vulpes) [35].

Brunkapaj molotroj (Molothrus ater) parazitas la nestojn de la Ruĝokula pipilo. En malnova kampo de Sudkarolino 5 el 19 nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo estis parazitataj [36]. Ĉiu parazitata nesto enhavis po 1 ovon de brunkapa molotro. La abandonindico ĉe parazitataj nestoj estis de 20%, kio estas simila ĉe nestoj ne parazititaj (21%). Du el kvin ovoj de brunkapa molotro produktas idojn. La studo ne precizigas ĉu estis diferenco inter sukceso de parazititaj kaj neparazititaj nestoj [36]. En Okcidenta Virginio, nur 3 el 41 nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo estis parazitataj fare de la brunkapa molotro. Averaĝa nombro de idoj en neparazititaj nestoj estis 2.8, kio estis simila al averaĝo de po 2.7 idoj ĉe parazititaj nestoj [28]. En studo pri loko de Pensilvanio, nur 2 el 36 nestoj estis parazititaj kaj ambaŭ produktis idojn de Ruĝokula pipilo [33]. En studo de nestoparazitado ĉe Insulo Sanibel, neniu el 5 trovitaj nestoj de Ruĝokula pipilo estis parazititaj [14].

Referencoj

  1. BirdLife International (2004). Pipilo erythrophthalmus. Internacia Ruĝa Listo de Endanĝeritaj Specioj, eldono de 2006. IUCN 2006. Elŝutita 12a Majo 2006.
  2. 2,00 2,01 2,02 2,03 2,04 2,05 2,06 2,07 2,08 2,09 2,10 2,11 2,12 2,13 2,14 2,15 2,16 2,17 Greenlaw, Jon S. 1996. Easter towhee – Pipilo erythrophthalmus. En: Poole, A.; Gill, F., eld. The birds of North America. No. 262: 1–32
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 National Geographic Society. 1999. Field guide to the birds of North America. 3a eld. Washington, DC: The National Geographic Society
  4. American Ornithologists' Union. 1957. Checklist of North American birds. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Lord Baltimore Press, Inc.
  5. 5,0 5,1 Bay, Michael Daymon. 1994. Effects of area and vegetation on breeding bird communities in early successional oldfields. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas. 128 p. Dissertation.
  6. 6,0 6,1 Gates, J. Edward; Dixon, Kenneth R. 1981. Right-of-way utilization by forest- and corridor-breeding bird populations. In: Arner, Dale, ed. Environmental concerns in right-of-way management: Proceeding of 2nd symposium; 1979 October 16–18; Ann Arbor, MI. Special Study Project WS-78-141: 66-1 to 66-7
  7. 7,0 7,1 7,2 7,3 7,4 7,5 7,6 7,7 Foss, Carol R. 1994. Atlas of breeding birds in New Hampshire. Dover, NH: Audubon Society of New Hampshire
  8. 8,0 8,1 Stupka, Arthur. 1963. Notes on the birds of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee Press
  9. 9,0 9,1 9,2 9,3 9,4 9,5 Mumford, Russell E.; Keller, Charles E. 1984. The birds of Indiana. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
  10. 10,0 10,1 10,2 10,3 10,4 10,5 10,6 Stevenson, Henry M.; Anderson, Bruce H. 1994. The birdlife of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press
  11. 11,0 11,1 11,2 11,3 11,4 11,5 Krementz, David G.; Powell, Larkin A. 2000. Breeding season demography and movements of eastern towhees at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. The Wilson Bulletin. 112(2): 243–248
  12. (1988) “Long-term changes in the breeding bird populations of a New Jersey forest”, Biological Conservation 46, p. 145. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90097-3.
  13. 13,0 13,1 Savidge, Irvin R.; Davis, David E. 1974. Survival of some common passerines in a Pennsylvania woodlot. Bird Banding. 45: 152–155
  14. 14,0 14,1 14,2 Prather, John W.; Cruz, Alexander. 2002. Distribution, abundance, and breeding biology of potential cowbird hosts on Sanibel Island, Florida. Florida Field Naturalist. 30(2): 21–76
  15. 15,0 15,1 15,2 Yahner, Richard H. 1991. Avian nesting ecology in small even-aged aspen stands. Journal of Wildlife Management. 55(1): 155–159
  16. Klimkiewicz, M. Kathleen; Futcher, Anthony G. 1987. Longevity records of North American birds: Coerebinae through Estrildidae. Journal of Field Ornithology. 58(3): 318–333
  17. 17,0 17,1 Yahner, Richard H. 1987. Use of even-aged stands by winter and spring bird communities. Wilson Bulletin. 99(2): 218–232
  18. Dickson, James G.; Noble, Robert E. 1978. Vertical distribution of birds in a Louisiana bottomland hardwood forest. The Wilson Bulletin. 90(1): 19–30.
  19. 19,0 19,1 Duguay, Jeffrey P.; Wood, Petra Bohall; Nichols, Jeffrey V. 2001. Songbird abundance and avian nest survival rates in forests fragmented by different silvicultural treatments. Conservation Biology. 15(5): 1405–1415.
  20. 20,0 20,1 (2003) “An explanation of patterns of breeding bird species richness and density following clearcutting in northeastern USA forests”, Forest Ecology and Management 174, p. 541. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00074-9.
  21. 21,0 21,1 Lanham, Joseph Drew. 1997. Attributes of avian communities in early-successional, clearcut habitats in the mountains and upper piedmont of South Carolina. Clemson, SC: Clemson University. Dissertation
  22. 22,0 22,1 22,2 22,3 Yahner, Richard H. 1986. Structure, seasonal dynamics, and habitat relationships of avian communities in small even-aged forest stands. The Wilson Bulletin. 98(1): 61–82
  23. 23,0 23,1 Bell, Jennifer L.; Whitmore, Robert C. 1997. Eastern towhee numbers increase following defoliation by gypsy moths. The Auk. 114(4): 708–716.
  24. 24,0 24,1 (2002) “Importance of Coarse Woody Debris to Avian Communities in Loblolly Pine Forests”, Conservation Biology 16, p. 767. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01019.x.
  25. Breininger, David R.; Smith, Rebecca B. 1992. Relationships between fire and bird density in coastal scrub and slash pine flatwoods in Florida. The American Midland Naturalist. 127(2): 233–240
  26. 26,0 26,1 Stauffer, Dean F.; Best, Louis B. 1980. Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities: evaluation effects of habitat alterations. Journal of Wildlife Management. 44(1): 1–15
  27. Suthers, Hannah B.; Bickal, Jean M.; Rodewald, Paul G. 2000. Use of successional habitat and fruit resources by songbirds during autumn migration in central New Jersey. The Wilson Bulletin. 112(2): 249–260
  28. 28,0 28,1 28,2 Bell, Jennifer L.; Whitmore, Robert C. 2000. Bird nesting ecology in a forest defoliated by gypsy moths. The Wilson Bulletin. 112(4): 524–531.
  29. 29,0 29,1 29,2 29,3 Morimoto, David C.; Wasserman, Fred E. 1991. Intersexual and interspecific differences in the foraging behavior of rufous-sided towhees, common yellowthroats and prairie warblers in the pine barrens of southeastern Massachusetts. Journal of Field Ornithology. 62(4): 436–449
  30. 30,0 30,1 Brush, Timothy; Stiles, Edmund W. 1990. Habitat use by breeding birds in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science. 35(2): 13–16
  31. Kroodsma, Roger. 1984. Effect of edge on breeding forest bird species. The Wilson Bulletin. 93(3): 426–436
  32. Lewis, Amy R.; Yahner, Richard H. 1999. Sex-specific habitat use by eastern towhees in a managed forested landscape. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science. 72(2): 77–79
  33. 33,0 33,1 Diefenbach, Duane R. 1996. Abundance and nest success of songbirds in simple and complex edge habitats. Final Report Project 06510. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Game Commission
  34. 34,0 34,1 34,2 34,3 Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Bood Company, Inc.
  35. Hockman, J. Gregory; Chapman, Joseph A. 1983. Comparative feeding habits of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Maryland. The American Midland Naturalist. 110(2): 276–285
  36. 36,0 36,1 Whitehead, Maria A.; Schweitzer, Sara H.; Post, William. 2002. Cowbird/host interaction in a southeastern old-field: a recent contact area? Journal of Field Ornithology. 73(4): 379–386

Plia legado

  • Greenlaw, J. S. 1996. Eastern Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus). In The Birds of North America, No. 262 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
  • Khanna, Hitesh. (1997). Comparing degradation in the Eastern towhee's (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) song introduction and trill. In Advances in Ethology. Taborsky, M. [Eldonisto], Taborsky, B. [Eldonisto]. Advances in Ethology; Contributions to the XXV International Ethological Conference. 117. Series Information: Advances in Ethology. Vol. 32.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Vikipedio aŭtoroj kaj redaktantoj
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EO

Ruĝokula pipilo: Brief Summary ( Esperanto )

provided by wikipedia EO

La Ruĝokula pipilo aŭ Orienta pipilo, Pipilo erythrophthalmus, estas granda specio de birdoj de la familio de Emberizedoj kaj amerika genro de Pipiloj, kiu enhavas pliajn 7 aŭ 8 speciojn. La taksonomio de la pipiloj estis ĵus pridisputata en la lastaj jardekoj, kaj iam tiu birdo kaj la proksima Makulpipilo estis konsiderataj ununura specio, nome Ruĝecflanka pipilo.

La birdospecia listo de Sibley-Monroe enkalkulas unusolan specion. Ĉe Usono, la American Ornithologists' Union agnoskas du speciojn: P. erythrophtalmus kaj P. maculatus, kriterio sekvata de la Internacia Unio por la Konservado de la Naturo. En Meksiko ekzistas du indiĝenaj variantoj, kiuj kutime estas konsiderataj kiel subspecioj aŭ specioj nome: P. (e.) macronyx kaj P. (e.) socorrensis.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Vikipedio aŭtoroj kaj redaktantoj
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EO

Pipilo erythrophthalmus ( Spanish; Castilian )

provided by wikipedia ES

El rascador zarcero (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) también denominado toquí flanquirrufo, rascador nororiental o ojirrojo, chingolo punteado y toquí pinto,[1]​ es una especie de ave paseriforme de la familia de los passerellida que vive en América. Su taxonomía es un tema debatido en ornitología, pues algunos consideran como una sola especie a una serie de poblaciones morfológicamente diversas entre sí que se distribuyen por América del Norte, México y Guatemala, mientras que otras opiniones las juzgan como dos, tres, o cuatro especies diferentes.

El presente artículo se basa en la lista de aves de Sibley-Monroe, que toma en cuenta una sola especie. Para el caso de Estados Unidos, la Unión de Ornitólogos de ese país reconoce dos especies: P. erythrophtalmus y P. maculatus, criterio que sigue la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. En México existen dos variedades autóctonas, que suelen ser consideradas a nivel de subespecie o especie: P. (e.) macronyx y P. (e.) socorrensis.

Descripción

 src=
Hembra del grupo erythrophthalmus.

Estas aves miden entre 18 y 21 cm de longitud, son de ojos rojos y presentan ligero dimorfismo sexual. El macho tiene la cabeza, la parte superior del pecho y las partes dorsales negras o pardas oscuras, con algunas manchas claras en espalda, alas y cola; los flancos son color canela y el pecho es blanco. La hembra mantiene el mismo patrón, pero es menos oscura en las partes superiores.

Peterson y Chalif distinguen cuatro morfos, que podrían constituir subespecies o especies:

 src=
Macho del grupo maculatus, con la espalda manchada. Columbia Británica (Canadá).
  1. El rascador del este (grupo erythrophthalmus). Las partes dorsales negras o pardas muy oscuras, con algunas manchas blancas en las alas pero no en la espalda. Habita en el este de los Estados Unidos.
  2. El rascador manchado (grupo maculatus). Con las partes dorsales negras o pardas oscuras, con manchas blancas en alas y espalda. Oeste de Norteamérica, México y Guatemala.
  3. El rascador de espalda olivácea (grupo macronyx). Con las partes dorsales color pardo oliváceo, con manchas claras en espalda y alas. Centro de México.
  4. El rascador de Socorro (grupo socorrensis). Sensiblemente más pequeño que los demás. De color gris en las partes dorsales, con manchas más claras en la espalda. Isla Socorro (México).

La American Ornithologists' Union reconoce dos especies, la especie del este (P. erythrophthalmus) y la del oeste (P. maculatus), y dentro de esta última incluye los morfos de Socorro y del centro de México. Sin embargo, la población de Socorro es en ocasiones considerada una especie distinta.

Los tres morfos de tierra firme son capaces de entrecruzarse. El morfo maculatus se sobrelapa en su distribución con los otros dos. Adicionalmente, este morfo se hibrida en México con el rascador pinto collarejo (P. ocai).

Buscan su alimento buscando alimento en el suelo, entre la hojarasca seca, o entre los arbustos. Se alimentan de artrópodos, semillas y frutos. Habitan áreas ricas en vegetación arbustiva, como bosques abiertos, ecotonos, chaparrales, matorrales y también jardines de ciudades.

Notas

Referencias

 title=
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autores y editores de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia ES

Pipilo erythrophthalmus: Brief Summary ( Spanish; Castilian )

provided by wikipedia ES

El rascador zarcero (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) también denominado toquí flanquirrufo, rascador nororiental o ojirrojo, chingolo punteado y toquí pinto,​ es una especie de ave paseriforme de la familia de los passerellida que vive en América. Su taxonomía es un tema debatido en ornitología, pues algunos consideran como una sola especie a una serie de poblaciones morfológicamente diversas entre sí que se distribuyen por América del Norte, México y Guatemala, mientras que otras opiniones las juzgan como dos, tres, o cuatro especies diferentes.

El presente artículo se basa en la lista de aves de Sibley-Monroe, que toma en cuenta una sola especie. Para el caso de Estados Unidos, la Unión de Ornitólogos de ese país reconoce dos especies: P. erythrophtalmus y P. maculatus, criterio que sigue la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. En México existen dos variedades autóctonas, que suelen ser consideradas a nivel de subespecie o especie: P. (e.) macronyx y P. (e.) socorrensis.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autores y editores de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia ES

Pipilo erythrophthalmus ( Basque )

provided by wikipedia EU

Pipilo erythrophthalmus Pipilo generoko animalia da. Hegaztien barruko Emberizidae familian sailkatua dago.

Erreferentziak

  1. (Ingelesez)BirdLife International (2012) Species factsheet. www.birdlife.org webgunetitik jaitsia 2012/05/07an
  2. (Ingelesez) IOC Master List

Ikus, gainera

(RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.log.warn("Gadget "ErrefAurrebista" was not loaded. Please migrate it to use ResourceLoader. See u003Chttps://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berezi:Gadgetaku003E.");});
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipediako egileak eta editoreak
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EU

Pipilo erythrophthalmus: Brief Summary ( Basque )

provided by wikipedia EU

Pipilo erythrophthalmus Pipilo generoko animalia da. Hegaztien barruko Emberizidae familian sailkatua dago.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipediako egileak eta editoreak
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EU

Loistopipilo ( Finnish )

provided by wikipedia FI

Loistopipilo (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) on sirkkulien heimoon kuuluva varpuslintu.

Levinneisyys

Loistopipiloita pesii Meksikossa, Yhdysvalloissa ja Kanadan eteläosissa.[1] Euroopassa se on tavattu vain kerran: Iso-Britanniassa kesäkuussa 1966.[2]

Lähteet

  1. a b c BirdLife International: Pipilo erythrophthalmus IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. 2012. International Union for Conservation of Nature, IUCN, Iucnredlist.org. Viitattu 16.2.2014. (englanniksi)
  2. Svensson, Lars: Lintuopas - Euroopan ja Välimeren alueen linnut, s. 421. Otava, 2010. ISBN 978-951-1-21351-2.
Tämä lintuihin liittyvä artikkeli on tynkä. Voit auttaa Wikipediaa laajentamalla artikkelia.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedian tekijät ja toimittajat
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia FI

Loistopipilo: Brief Summary ( Finnish )

provided by wikipedia FI

Loistopipilo (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) on sirkkulien heimoon kuuluva varpuslintu.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedian tekijät ja toimittajat
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia FI

Tohi à flancs roux ( French )

provided by wikipedia FR

Pipilo erythrophthalmus

Le Tohi à flancs roux (Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus, 1758) est une espèce de passereau appartenant à la famille des Passerellidae.

Description

Cet oiseau mesure 19 à 20 cm.

Habitat

Le Tohi à flancs roux peuple les zones de buissons, les bosquets, les lisières de forêts et les jardins.

Répartition

 src=
Carte de répartition.
  • Aire de nidification
  • Voie migratoire
  • Présent à l'année
  • Aire d'hivernage

Cet oiseau vit en Amérique du Nord.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Auteurs et éditeurs de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia FR

Tohi à flancs roux: Brief Summary ( French )

provided by wikipedia FR

Pipilo erythrophthalmus

Le Tohi à flancs roux (Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus, 1758) est une espèce de passereau appartenant à la famille des Passerellidae.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Auteurs et éditeurs de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia FR

Roodflanktowie ( Dutch; Flemish )

provided by wikipedia NL

Vogels

De roodflanktowie of oostelijke towie (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) is een in het oosten van Noord-Amerika voorkomend lid van de gorzenfamilie.

Kenmerken

De Roodflanktowie meet van het puntje van de snavel tot het uiteinde van de staart 20 centimeter en weegt ongeveer 43 gram. De seksen verschillen: het mannetje is zwart van boven, wit van onder en heeft roodbruine flanken, het vrouwtje is van boven donkerbruin. De soort heeft rode ogen, behalve de in Florida voorkomende ondersoort, die ook iets kleiner is.

De roep is een karakteristiek herhalend towie of tsjewink; de zang is helder gefloten drielettergrepig waarvan de laatste een triller.

Voortplanting

Het nest bestaat uit een door het vrouwtje gebouwd kommetje van twijgjes, wortelstokken en bladeren, gevoerd met fijner materiaal zoals gras. Het legsel bestaat uit 2 tot 6 roomkleurige of grijzige eitjes die 23 millimeter groot zijn. De jongen worden in een dag of twaalf door het vrouwtje uitgebroed, waarna ze nog een week of twee door beide ouders worden verzorgd.

Verspreiding en leefgebied

Het verspreidingsgebied wordt in het westen begrensd door de Great Plains, in het noorden ruwweg door de 50-ste graad noorderbreedte, de Atlantische Oceaan en de Golf van Mexico. De zomer- en winterareaal overlappen elkaar voor een groot gedeelte, alleen het uiterste noorden en noordwesten van het verspreidingsgebied wordt in de winter verlaten. De roodflanktowie broedt in open terrein op of vlak boven de grond in de ondergroei.

De soort telt 4 ondersoorten:

  • P. e. erythrophthalmus: van het zuidelijke deel van Centraal-en zuidoostelijk Canada tot de oostelijk-centrale Verenigde Staten.
  • P. e. canaster: binnenlandse zuidoostelijke Verenigde Staten.
  • P. e. rileyi: de zuidoostkust van de Verenigde Staten behalve centraal en zuidelijk Florida.
  • P. e. alleni: Florida.

Waarnemingen in Nederland

Van deze soort zijn geen waarnemingen in Nederland bekend.

Bronnen, noten en/of referenties
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia-auteurs en -editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia NL

Roodflanktowie: Brief Summary ( Dutch; Flemish )

provided by wikipedia NL

De roodflanktowie of oostelijke towie (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) is een in het oosten van Noord-Amerika voorkomend lid van de gorzenfamilie.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia-auteurs en -editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia NL

Pipil rudoboczny ( Polish )

provided by wikipedia POL
Commons Multimedia w Wikimedia Commons

Pipil rudoboczny[3] (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) – gatunek ptaka z rodziny pasówek (Passerellidae).

Systematyka

Wyróżniono kilka podgatunków P. erythrophthalmus[4][3][5]:

  • P. erythrophthalmus erythrophthalmuspipil rudoboczny– południowo-środkowa i południowo-wschodnia Kanada do wschodnio-środkowego USA.
  • P. erythrophthalmus canaster – południowo-wschodnie USA.
  • P. erythrophthalmus rileyi – wybrzeża południowo-wschodniego USA z wyjątkiem środkowej i południowej Florydy.
  • P. erythrophthalmus allenipipil białooki – Floryda.

Morfologia

Długość ciała 17,3–20,6 cm, masa ciała: 32,1–52,3 g[5]. Wierzch ciała, gardło oraz pierś czarne; boki rdzawe, brzuch biały; na czarnych skrzydłach i ogonie widoczny biały rysunek. Samica podobna, lecz zamiast koloru czarnego, pióra są brązowe. Młode ptaki z wierzchu bardziej brązowe, od spodu jasne, w gęste kreski. U samców z zachodu zasięgu widać białe plamy na grzbiecie. Tęczówki u wschodnich i zachodnich podgatunków czerwone, u południowych białe.

Zasięg, środowisko

Zarośla w środkowej i południowej części Ameryki Północnej, z wyjątkiem obszarów preriowych o niskiej trawie. Na zimę odlatuje na południe.

Przypisy

  1. Pipilo erythrophthalmus, w: Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ang.).
  2. BirdLife International 2012, Pipilo erythrophthalmus [w:] The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015 [online], wersja 2015-4 [dostęp 2015-12-13] (ang.).
  3. a b P. Mielczarek, M. Kuziemko: Rodzina: Passerellidae Cabanis & Heine, 1850-51 - pasówki - New world sparrows and allies (wersja: 2015-07-08). W: Kompletna lista ptaków świata [on-line]. Instytut Nauk o Środowisku Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. [dostęp 2015-12-13].
  4. F. Gill, D. Donsker: Bananaquit, buntings, sparrows & bush tanagers (ang.). IOC World Bird List: Version 5.4. [dostęp 2015-12-13].
  5. a b Rising, J. & Bonan, A.: Eastern Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus). W: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) (2014). Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive [on-line]. 2014. [dostęp 7 grudnia 2015].

Bibliografia

  1. Wiesław Dudziński, Marek Keller, Andrew Gosler: Atlas ptaków świata. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Multico, 2000. ISBN 83-7073-059-0.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autorzy i redaktorzy Wikipedii
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia POL

Pipil rudoboczny: Brief Summary ( Polish )

provided by wikipedia POL

Pipil rudoboczny (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) – gatunek ptaka z rodziny pasówek (Passerellidae).

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autorzy i redaktorzy Wikipedii
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia POL

Pipilo erythrophthalmus ( Portuguese )

provided by wikipedia PT

O Pipilo erythrophthalmus é uma espécie de pássaro Pardal. A taxonomia dessa espécie está em debate nas últimas décadas e, anteriormente, o Pardal manchado eram considerados uma única espécie, o pardal-do-mato.

Seu habitat de reprodução são áreas de montanha no leste América do Norte. Eles aninham-se em arbustos ou no chão, debaixo de arbustos. As aves do norte migram para o sul dos Estados Unidos. Houve um registro dessa espécie como vagante na Europa Ocidental: um único pássaro na Grã-Bretanha em 1966.[1]

Taxonomia

O passáro foi descrito pelo naturalista sueco Carl Linnaeus em 1758 na décima edição de seu Systema Naturae e recebeu o nome binomial de Fringilla erythrophthalma .[2] Esta espécie é agora colocada no gênero Pipilo, introduzido pelo ornitólogo francês Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot em 1816.[3] O nome específico erythrophthalmus / erythrophthalma combina as palavras gregas antigas ερυθρος eruthros "vermelho" e οφθαλμος ophthalmos "eye".

Quatro subespécies são reconhecidas:[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]

  • Educaçao Fisica. erythrophalmus ( Linnaeus, 1758), encontrado centro-sul e sudeste do Canadá no leste dos Estados Unidos
  • Educaçao Fisica. canaster ( Howell, AH, 1913), encontrado no interior do sudeste dos Estados Unidos
  • Educaçao Fisica. rileyi ( Koelz, 1939), encontrado no litoral dos Estados Unidos, exceto no centro e sul da Flórida
  • Educaçao Fisica. alleni ( Coues, 1871) encontrada no sul e no centro da Flórida
 src=
Fêmea

Referências

  1. Greenlaw, Jon S. (1996). Easter towhee – Pipilo erythrophthalmus. In: Poole, A.; Gill, F., eds. The birds of North America. No. 262: 1–32
  2. Linnaeus, Carl (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Holmiae:Laurentii Salvii (em latim). Volume 1 10th ed. [S.l.: s.n.]
  3. Vieillot, Louis Jean Pierre (1816). Analyse d'une Nouvelle Ornithologie Elementaire. Deterville/self (em francês). Paris: [s.n.] [Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot Resumo divulgativo] Verifique valor |resumo-url= (ajuda)
  4. Kroodsma, Roger (1984). «Effect of edge on breeding forest bird species» (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 93 (3): 426–436
  5. Leck, C; Murray, Bertram G.; Swinebroad, Jeff (1988). «Long-term changes in the breeding bird populations of a New Jersey forest». Biological Conservation. 46 (2): 145. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90097-3
  6. Bell, Jennifer L.; Whitmore, Robert C. (1997). «Eastern towhee numbers increase following defoliation by gypsy moths» (PDF). The Auk. 114 (4): 708–716. JSTOR 4089290. doi:10.2307/4089290
  7. Bell, Jennifer L.; Whitmore, Robert C. (2000). «Bird nesting ecology in a forest defoliated by gypsy moths». The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (4): 524–531. JSTOR 4164273. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0524:BNEIAF]2.0.CO;2
  8. Breininger, David R.; Smith, Rebecca B. (1992). «Relationships between fire and bird density in coastal scrub and slash pine flatwoods in Florida» (PDF). The American Midland Naturalist. 127 (2): 233–240. JSTOR 2426529. doi:10.2307/2426529
  9. Brush, Timothy; Stiles, Edmund W. (1990). «Habitat use by breeding birds in the New Jersey Pine Barrens». Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science. 35 (2): 13–16
  10. Duguay, Jeffrey P.; Wood, Petra Bohall; Nichols, Jeffrey V. (2001). «Songbird abundance and avian nest survival rates in forests fragmented by different silvicultural treatments». Conservation Biology. 15 (5): 1405–1415. JSTOR 3061496. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99023.x
  11. Hockman, J. Gregory; Chapman, Joseph A. (1983). «Comparative feeding habits of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Maryland». The American Midland Naturalist. 110 (2): 276–285. JSTOR 2425269. doi:10.2307/2425269
  12. Keller, J; Richmond, M.E; Smith, C.R (2003). «An explanation of patterns of breeding bird species richness and density following clearcutting in northeastern USA forests». Forest Ecology and Management. 174 (1–3): 541. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00074-9
  13. Klimkiewicz, M. Kathleen; Futcher, Anthony G. (1987). «Longevity records of North American birds: Coerebinae through Estrildidae» (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 58 (3): 318–333. JSTOR 4513247
  14. Krementz, David G.; Powell, Larkin A. (2000). «Breeding season demography and movements of Eastern Towhees at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina» (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (2): 243–248. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0243:BSDAMO]2.0.CO;2. Consultado em 25 de julho de 2010. Arquivado do original (PDF) em 23 de julho de 2011
  15. Lanham, Joseph Drew. (1997). Attributes of avian communities in early-successional, clearcut habitats in the mountains and upper piedmont of South Carolina. Clemson, SC: Clemson University. Dissertation
  16. Lewis, Amy R.; Yahner, Richard H. (1999). «Sex-specific habitat use by Eastern Towhees in a managed forested landscape». Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science. 72 (2): 77–79
  17. Lohr, Steven M.; Gauthreaux, Sidney A.; Kilgo, John C. (2002). «Importance of Coarse Woody Debris to Avian Communities in Loblolly Pine Forests». Conservation Biology. 16 (3): 767. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01019.x
  18. Morimoto, David C.; Wasserman, Fred E. (1991). «Intersexual and interspecific differences in the foraging behavior of rufous-sided towhees, common yellowthroats and prairie warblers in the pine barrens of southeastern Massachusetts» (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 62 (4): 436–449. JSTOR 20065822
  19. Prather, John W.; Cruz, Alexander (2002). «Distribution, abundance, and breeding biology of potential cowbird hosts on Sanibel Island, Florida». Florida Field Naturalist. 30 (2): 21–76
  20. Savidge, Irvin R.; Davis, David E. (1974). «Survival of some common passerines in a Pennsylvania woodlot» (PDF). Bird Banding. 45 (2): 152–155. JSTOR 4512023. doi:10.2307/4512023
  21. Stauffer, Dean F.; Best, Louis B. (1980). «Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities: evaluation effects of habitat alterations». Journal of Wildlife Management. 44 (1): 1–15. JSTOR 3808345. doi:10.2307/3808345
  22. Suthers, Hannah B.; Bickal, Jean M.; Rodewald, Paul G. (2000). «Use of successional habitat and fruit resources by songbirds during autumn migration in central New Jersey». The Wilson Bulletin. 112 (2): 249–260. JSTOR 4164202. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0249:UOSHAF]2.0.CO;2
  23. Whitehead, Maria A.; Schweitzer, Sara H.; Post, William (2002). «Cowbird/host interaction in a southeastern old-field: a recent contact area?». Journal of Field Ornithology. 73 (4): 379–386. doi:10.1648/0273-8570-73.4.379
  24. Yahner, Richard H. (1986). «Structure, seasonal dynamics, and habitat relationships of avian communities in small even-aged forest stands» (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 98 (1): 61–82. JSTOR 4162184
  25. Yahner, Richard H. (1987). «Use of even-aged stands by winter and spring bird communities» (PDF). Wilson Bulletin. 99 (2): 218–232. JSTOR 4162381
  26. Yahner, Richard H. (1991). «Avian nesting ecology in small even-aged aspen stands». Journal of Wildlife Management. 55 (1): 155–159. JSTOR 3809253. doi:10.2307/3809253
  27. «IOC World Bird List». www.worldbirdnames.org (em inglês)

 title=
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia PT

Pipilo erythrophthalmus: Brief Summary ( Portuguese )

provided by wikipedia PT

O Pipilo erythrophthalmus é uma espécie de pássaro Pardal. A taxonomia dessa espécie está em debate nas últimas décadas e, anteriormente, o Pardal manchado eram considerados uma única espécie, o pardal-do-mato.

Seu habitat de reprodução são áreas de montanha no leste América do Norte. Eles aninham-se em arbustos ou no chão, debaixo de arbustos. As aves do norte migram para o sul dos Estados Unidos. Houve um registro dessa espécie como vagante na Europa Ocidental: um único pássaro na Grã-Bretanha em 1966.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia PT

Brunsidig busksparv ( Swedish )

provided by wikipedia SV

Brunsidig busksparv[2] (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) är en fågel i familjen amerikanska sparvar inom ordningen tättingar.[3]

Kännetecken

Utseende

Brunsidig busksparv är en stor och karakteristisk amerikansk sparv med en längd på 17-23 centimeter.[4] Adulta fåglar har rödbruna kroppsidor, vit buk och en lång stjärt med vita hörn. Ovansida, huvud och stjärt är mörka, svart hos hanen och brunt hos honan. Den har även en vit fläck vid handpennornas bas. Ögat är rött för de flesta populationer men vitt i sydost. Jämfört med den västliga arten fläckig busksparv (som tidigare behandlades som en del av brunsidig busksparv) saknar den vita fläckar på skapularerna och dubbla vita vingband.[5]

Läte

Sången består av en till tre korta toner följt av en långsammare mer musikalisk drill, på engelska klassiskt återgett som "drink your tea".[5]

Utbredning och systematik

Brunsidig busksparv delas upp i två grupper med sammanlagt fyra underarter, med följande utbredning:[3]

Fågeln har påträffats i Europa vid ett enda tillfälle när en hona ringmärktes i Lundy, Devon, England 7 juni 1966.[6]

Tidigare inkluderades även fläckig busksparv (Pipilo maculatus) i arten.

Levnadssätt

Brunsidig busksparv påträffas i solbelysta gläntor, buskmarker och undervegetation i öppen skog.[5] Den rör sig ofta ensamt där den födosöker på marken efter frön och insekter.[5] Honan lägger en till tre kullar med två till sex ägg som ruvas i tolv till 13 dagar.[4]

Status och hot

Arten har ett stort utbredningsområde och en stor population med stabil utveckling.[1] Utifrån dessa kriterier kategoriserar IUCN arten som livskraftig (LC).[1] Världspopulationen uppskattas till 28 miljoner häckande individer.[7]

Referenser

  1. ^ [a b c] Birdlife International 2012 Pipilo erythrophthalmus Från: IUCN 2014. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3 www.iucnredlist.org. Läst 2015-04-01.
  2. ^ Sveriges ornitologiska förening (2017) Officiella listan över svenska namn på världens fågelarter, läst 2017-08-14
  3. ^ [a b] Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, D. Roberson, T. A. Fredericks, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood (2014) The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.9 http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download, läst 2015-02-01
  4. ^ [a b] Eastern Towhee Faktablad om brunsidig busksparv på allaboutbird.org
  5. ^ [a b c d] Sibley, David Allen (2003). The Sibley Field Guide to Birds of Eastern North America. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. sid. 45. ISBN 0-679-45120-X
  6. ^ Fynd av brunsidig busksparv i Västpalearktis på Tarsiger.com
  7. ^ Partners in Flight. 2017. Avian Conservation Assessment Database. 2017.

Externa länkar

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia författare och redaktörer
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia SV

Brunsidig busksparv: Brief Summary ( Swedish )

provided by wikipedia SV

Brunsidig busksparv (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) är en fågel i familjen amerikanska sparvar inom ordningen tättingar.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia författare och redaktörer
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia SV

Pipilo erythrophthalmus ( Vietnamese )

provided by wikipedia VI

Pipilo erythrophthalmus là một loài chim trong họ Emberizidae.[1]

Chú thích

  1. ^ Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, B.L. Sullivan, C. L. Wood, and D. Roberson (2012). “The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.7.”. Truy cập ngày 19 tháng 12 năm 2012.

Tham khảo


Hình tượng sơ khai Bài viết Bộ Sẻ này vẫn còn sơ khai. Bạn có thể giúp Wikipedia bằng cách mở rộng nội dung để bài được hoàn chỉnh hơn.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia tác giả và biên tập viên
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia VI

Pipilo erythrophthalmus: Brief Summary ( Vietnamese )

provided by wikipedia VI

Pipilo erythrophthalmus là một loài chim trong họ Emberizidae.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia tác giả và biên tập viên
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia VI

Красноглазый тауи ( Russian )

provided by wikipedia русскую Википедию
Царство: Животные
Подцарство: Эуметазои
Без ранга: Вторичноротые
Подтип: Позвоночные
Инфратип: Челюстноротые
Надкласс: Четвероногие
Класс: Птицы
Подкласс: Настоящие птицы
Инфракласс: Новонёбные
Инфраотряд: Passerida
Надсемейство: Passeroidea
Семейство: Овсянковые
Род: Тауи
Вид: Красноглазый тауи
Международное научное название

Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Охранный статус Wikispecies-logo.svg
Систематика
на Викивидах
Commons-logo.svg
Изображения
на Викискладе
ITIS 179276NCBI 161625EOL 1052548FW 368715

Красноглазый тауи[1] (лат. Pipilo erythrophthalmus) — певчая птица из семейства овсянковых.

Описание

Красноглазый тауи длиной 23 см. Боковые стороны красно-коричневого цвета, брюхо белое, длинный тёмный хвост с белыми краями. Цвет глаз в общем красный, только у юго-восточной популяции он белый. Окраска головы, верхней части тела и хвоста у самца чёрного, у самки — коричневого цвета.

Распространение

Красноглазый тауи живёт в открытых полях, чащах, на опушках кустарника и леса с юга Канады через США до Мексики. Северные популяции проводят зиму на юге Северной Америки.

Питание

Птица ворошит листья на земле в поисках насекомых, пауков и плодов.

Размножение

Самка в одиночку строит чашеобразное гнездо из веток и травы на земле или между нижними ветвями куста. В кладке от 2-х до 6-и яиц, высиживание которой длится примерно 2 недели. Птенцов выкармливают обе родительские птицы 2 недели. Молодые птицы остаются с родителями вплоть до конца лета.

Примечания

  1. Бёме Р. Л., Флинт В. Е. Пятиязычный словарь названий животных. Птицы. Латинский, русский, английский, немецкий, французский / Под общ. ред. акад. В. Е. Соколова. — М.: Рус. яз., «РУССО», 1994. — С. 401. — 2030 экз.ISBN 5-200-00643-0.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Авторы и редакторы Википедии

Красноглазый тауи: Brief Summary ( Russian )

provided by wikipedia русскую Википедию

Красноглазый тауи (лат. Pipilo erythrophthalmus) — певчая птица из семейства овсянковых.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Авторы и редакторы Википедии

ワキアカトウヒチョウ ( Japanese )

provided by wikipedia 日本語

ワキアカトウヒチョウ(学名:Pipilo erythrophthalmus)は、スズメ目ホオジロ科に分類される鳥類の一種。

Sibley分類体系上の位置[編集]

スズメ目 Passeriformes

鳴禽亜目 Passeri
スズメ小目 Passerida
スズメ上科 Passeroidea
アトリ科 Fringillidae
ホオジロ亜科 Emberizinae
ホオジロ族 Emberizini

画像[編集]

 src=
ワキアカトウヒチョウ
執筆の途中です この項目は、鳥類に関連した書きかけの項目です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めていますポータル鳥類 - PJ鳥類)。
 title=
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
ウィキペディアの著者と編集者
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia 日本語

ワキアカトウヒチョウ: Brief Summary ( Japanese )

provided by wikipedia 日本語

ワキアカトウヒチョウ(学名:Pipilo erythrophthalmus)は、スズメ目ホオジロ科に分類される鳥類の一種。

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
ウィキペディアの著者と編集者
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia 日本語