dcsimg

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Spodoptera eridania (Stoll)
Figs. 21, 23, 34, 37, 42, 139, 146-148, 221-223, 317, 347, 379,
411, 443, 477-479, 529
Phalaena eridania Stoll, in Cramer 1782: 133, plate 358, figs. E, F (1781); index p. 249 (1782).
Noctua linea Fabricius 1794: 106.
Phalaena phytolaccae J.E. Smith 1797: 193, plate 97; Walker 1856: 195.
Xylomyges putrida Guenee, in Boisduval & Guenee 1852a: 148.
Xylomyges amygia Guenee, in Boisduval & Guenee 1852a: 149.
Leucania externa Walker 1856: 114.
Xylina bipunctata Walker 1857b: 629.
Xylina inquieta Walker 1857b: 632.
Prodenia strigifera Walker 1858: 1678.
Laphygma peruviana Walker 1865a: 650; [Synonymized by Todd & Poole 1980: 733).
Laphygma communicata Walker 1869: 31; [Synonymized by Todd & Poole 1980: 733).
Actinotia derupta Morrison 1875: 62.
Prodenia ignobilis Butler 1878: 485.
Leucania nigrofasciata Hulst 1881: 77.
Laphygma eridania; Druce 1889: 268.
Callierges recondita Moschler 1890: 140.
Prodenia eridania; Smith 1891: 45; Smith 1893: 169; Grote 1895: 42; Dyar 1903: 123; Barnes & McDunnough 1917: 67; McDunnough 1938: 96; Richards 1941: 238; Linsley & Usinger 1966: 160.
Xylomyges eridania; Hampson 1909: 271.
Spodoptera eridania; Hayes 1975: 174; Todd & Poole 1980: 730; Franclemont & Todd 1983: 141; Goater 1983: 278; Poole 1989: 923; Poole & Gentili 1996: 774.
Diagnosis. — Forewing with a short longitudinal black dash at base of posterior margin, which can be faint in worn specimens (Figs. 221-223).
Reniform spot round, black (Fig. 222), but usually very faint, or can be modified into a distinct longitudinal black streak extending to wing margin
browner than in S. albula. Male genitalia with valve narrower (Figs. 317, 347) than in S. albula
genitalia with a bifurcate median projection on distal margin of ventral plate of ostium bursa
whitish.
Description. Adult Male. — Head: Basal segment of labial palpus cream with median patch variably mixed with black and rufous scales; median segment cream with black median band variably mixed with rufous scales; apical segment cream mixed with rufous scales. Frons with short scales cream; long scales cream; lateral spots at eye margin rufous; vertex cream to rufous. Antenna filiform; scape cream; flagellum cream.
Thorax: Patagium light brown flecked with black, median transverse band white. Tegula light brown (tips of a few scales black). Mesothorax with light brown and brown scales, some tipped white. Underside of thorax white. Prothoracic femur light brown to fuscous; tibia with lateral scale tufts not extending beyond first tarsal segment, fuscous and rufous, subapical spot absent; first tarsal segment light brown mixed with cream, remainder light brown, cream apical rings present only on tarsal segments 1 and 2. Mesothoracic femur cream and rufous; tibia cream and rufous, inner spur more than twice length of outer spur, spurs completely scaled, first tarsal segment light brown mixed with cream, remainder light brown, apical rings on tarsal segments 1-4. Metathoracic femur cream and rufous; tibia cream and rufous; first tarsal segment light brown mixed with cream, remainder light brown, apical rings on tarsal segments 1-4.
Forewing: Length, 13-15.5 mm; ground color cream; basal line absent; indistinct short longitudinal black dash at base along posterior margin; R vein not a contrasting color; basal scale patch between R and Cu veins absent; basal half circle scale patch below Cu vein absent; antemedial line absent; claviform spot absent; basal scale patch absent; indistinct gray patch covering anal cell and half of cell CuA2; oblique brown mark from fifth outer marginal spot to vein CuA2; curved white line from antemedial line to postmedial line absent; orbicular spot absent; reniform spot
round, black, or can include a black longitudinal streak ending at outer margin (can be faint to absent in some specimens); white scales along Cu vein and bases of M3 and CuAl veins absent; postmedial line absent; postmedian band undifferentiated; black scale patches in middle of cells in postmedian area absent; subterminal line absent; apex lacking a white patch; minute black spots along outer margin; fringe brown. Underside ground color cream; outer margin with black spots; reniform spot round, black, or in the form of a longitudinal streak dark gray and not extending to outer margin.
Hindiving: Ground color white; apex, outer margin to vein CuA2, and distal ends of veins Rs to CuA2 with light brown scales; fringe white. Underside ground color white; costal cells C and Sc cream speckled with brown scales; outer margin with gray triangular spots in middle of cells Sc to CuAl (indistinct); no spot on underside.
Abdomen: Dorsum pale gray; venter cream and rufous; disto-lateral black spots on sternites; 8th tergite with spiculate patches absent on caudal margin.
Genitalia: Uncus evenly curved; maintaining width throughout three-fourths length, narrowing to pointed apex; setae absent or few. Scaphium elongate, well sclerotized. Tegumen with a pair of projecting arms on upper third. Costa convex (Figs. 317, 347). Costal process short, wide. Cucullus curved at costal apex, outer margin straight. Anellifer with lightly sclerotized plate bearing setae absent. Ampulla a short, thumbshaped lobe, apex round (Figs. 317, 347). Clasper proper apex pointed, curved toward costa (Figs. 317, 347). Clavus absent. Sacculus broad on basal half, tapering distally; apex pointed. Valvula narrower than valve; well differentiated from valve, apex free; apex round; indentation absent. Coremata moderately elongate, approximately 0.5 or less length of valve; composed of a single lobe. Juxta a narrow rectangular band, median process wide as base and constricted near apical third, ventral margin a broad inverted V-shape. Anellus with a sclerotized plate with lateral spines. Vinculum round. Aedoeagus straight; coecum smaller in diameter than shaft; patch of spines absent on apex of membranous sheath surrounding aedoeagus. Vesica curving dorsally; short, less than 0.75 length of aedoeagus; apicobasal cornutal patch a wide ribbon; length moderate, extending to before middle of vesica; cornuti in form of minute
flat granules; lateral cornutal patch a narrow elongate ribbon, divided basally; a mixture of short, conical, and more elongate slender spines; dense cornutal patch at apex of vesica; distal cornutus absent.
Adult Female. — Essentially as described for male except:
Forezving: Length, 13-16 mm.
Abdomen: Fine dense scales on 8th segment black.
Genitalia: Ventral plate of ostium bursa wider than high; distal margin with a bifurcate median projection; ventrolateral invaginated pocket of 8th sternite absent. Ductus bursae short (length less than twice width); completely sclerotized. Appendix bursae membranous. Corpus bursae elongate, length greater than twice width; striate convolutions. Signum at middle of corpus bursae; elongate, length greater than 1.15 mm; forming less than a 45 and greater than a 30 degree angle to vertical axis of corpus bursae, oriented left to right.
Larva. — See description, p. 105.
Type material. — Phalaena eridania Stoll. The type material was not located during this study and is considered lost. The neotype 8 [USNM, here designated] is labeled: Archbold Biol. Sta.,; L. Placid, Highlands; County, Florida; 8 Jan. 1983; D. C. Ferguson. USNM ENT 00057649. The neotype is designated and labeled to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species and is illustrated in Fig. 222. Type locality: Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, Highlands County, Florida.
Noctua linea Fabricius. The type is apparently lost. Type locality: "Americae Meridionalis Insulis" [West Indies].
Phalaena phytolaccae J.E. Smith. The type is apparently lost. Type locality: Georgia, USA.
Xylomyges pntrida Guenee. The holotype S [BMNH] is labeled: Guadeloupe. Type locality: Guadeloupe.
Xylomyges amygia Guenee. The lectotype [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: Nova Friburgo, Brazil. The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species. Type locality: Nova Friburgo, Brazil. The following syntypes become paralectotypes: (1) Label data: Brasil Becker; (3) Label data: Brasil; (4) Label data: Fribourg.
Leucania externa Walker. The holotype 9 [BMNH] is labeled: St. Vincent, 39-7-17, 70; Noc
tuidae genitalia slide No. 1494 9 . Type locality: St. Vincent.
Xylina bipunctata Walker. The type(s) are deposited in University Museum, Oxford University, Oxford. Type locality: Brazil.
Xylina inqideta Walker. The holotype 9 [BMNH] is labeled: [No locality label] Xylina inquieta; Noctuidae genitalia slide No. 1493 9 . Type locality: unknown.
Prodenia strigifera Walker. The holotype [BMNH] is labeled: Amazonas, Ega, 58-6. Type locality: Tefe, Brazil.
Laphygma peruviana Walker. The 9 lectotype [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: [No locality label]; Syntype, Norris Coll., 73-41; Leucania, peruviana. The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species. Type locality: Peru.
Laphygma communicata Walker. The 8 lectotype [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: Syntype, Norris Coll. 73-41; Peru; communicata; Noctuidae genitalia slide No. 1500 8 . The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species. Type locality: Peru.
Actinotia derupta Morrison. The type(s) are deposited in Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Type locality: Texas, USA.
Prodenia ignobilis Butler. The 8 lectotype [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: Jamaica, J. J. Bowrey, 78-19; Prodenia ignobilis, Butler Type; Noctuidae genitalia slide No. 1498 8 . The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species.Type locality: Jamaica.
Leucania nigrofasciata Hulst. The holotype 9 [AMNH] is labeled: Fla., USA. Collection CD. Hulst; Leucania, nigrofasciata, Type, Hulst. Type locality: Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Callierges recondita Moschler. The 2 9 syntypes are deposited in Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt University, Berlin. Type locality: Puerto Rico.
Material Examined. — Specimens were examined from the following countries: Argentina, Bahamas, Bermuda, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, St. Lucia, Surinam, United States, Venezuela.
Distribution (Fig. 529). — This species occurs in
the southeastern United States from Maryland south to Florida and west to Kentucky and Texas. Strays have been reported in northeastern Ohio (Rings et al. 1992). In the Neotropics it ranges from Mexico, throughout the Caribbean, and south through Central America to Argentina.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Pogue, M.G. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 20. Philadelphia, USA

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Spodoptera eridania (Stoll)
Figs. 146-148, 477^79
Diagnosis. — The subspiracular line is either interrupted or loses intensity at the lateral spot. The black dorsal triangles on the first abdominal segment are large and equal in size to those on the eighth segment. The total number of crochets on one side of body ranges from 97-109 with an average of 102.9. The number of crochets is important as only S. exigua and S. frugiperda share this character. Spodoptera eridania can be easily separated from S. frugiperda by the lack of large, con*' spicuous, dorsal pinacula. Spodoptera exigua is much smaller and usually lacks dorsal triangular markings on the abdomen. If they are present, then they are smaller and do not reach near the middorsal line.
Description of preserved specimens. — Head: Color yellowish brown; reticulate; frons yellowish brown; cutting edge of mandible serrate; P2 setae farther apart than PI setae; ratio ecdysial line: frons height, averages between 0.63-0.84.
Thorax: Pronotum with dorsolateral stripe conspicuous, either solid or consisting of closely spaced spots and dashes; middorsal stripe wider than dorsolateral stripe. Mesothorax segmental spot rectangular (can be inconspicuous); with lateral dark spot absent. Metathorax with segmental spot triangular; white spot absent; lateral dark spot absent. Abdomen: Body smooth; setal pinacula minute. Middorsal stripe inconspicuous, narrower than dorsolateral stripe. Segmental spots equal in size on abdominal segments 1 and 8, smaller on 2-6; wide on segments 1 and 8, almost extending to middorsal stripe; lacking contrasting marks; on 8th abdominal segment larger than on mesothorax. Segment 1 with lateral dark spot present (can be smaller and not enclosing spiracle). Segments 2-6 with lateral dark spots in spiracular band absent (can be small and obscure when spiracular band mottled). Spiracular band reticulate; spiracular band on segments 1-6 with white or light colored spot caudal to spiracle present (can be inconspicuous). Spiracles with black border and brown center; not stalked. Subspiracular stripe interrupted on abdominal segment 1, inconspicuous beyond segment 1. Crochets uniordinal; total number on one side of body averages less than 106, but some specimens can have as many as 109 (range: 97-109; mean: 102.9; n=10).
Color description. — Mature larvae 35-38 mm in length. Head ground color yellow heavily suffused with bright reddish-brown reticulation which is more or less fused forming solid areas of reddish brown; adfrontal sutures pale but not white; adfrontal area brown. General dorsal color a deep, uniform gray sometimes tinged with olivaceous or pinkish. Middorsal stripe, dorsolateral stripe, and subspiracular stripe unicolorous, whitish tinged with orange or pinkish. Segmental spots a series of black triangles angulate on their dorsal faces. Lateral band dark fuscous, dorsal half paler. Venter pale, suffused with pinkish or orange and much flecked with white. Spiracles brown with dark rims. Thoracic legs uniform infuscated brown. Prolegs pinkish (Crumb 1929, 1932).
Plant hosts. — S. eridania is polyphagous with 102 species of larval hosts recorded. Important agricultural crops on which it feeds include corn, tomatoes, potatoes, beans, and sweet potatoes. Scriber (1986) hypothesized that pokeweed may be a natural host plant of S. eridania. He observed
4 separate groups of larvae feeding on pokeweed (Phytolacca rigida (Small), Phytolaccaceae) among many other species of potential hosts. Only the pokeweed was utilized as a host. Since S. eridania is among one of the most polyphagous species of Spodoptera, were the larvae showing some type of preference for pokeweed?
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Pogue, M.G. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 20. Philadelphia, USA

Spodoptera eridania

provided by wikipedia EN

Spodoptera eridania (southern armyworm) is a moth that is known to be a pest. They are one of the most important defoliators in the tropical and subtropical regions of the western hemisphere that feed heavily on plants while they are young, often resulting in skeleton leaves on their food plants. They are also heavy feeders on tomato in Florida. There is a lot of development in producing pesticides against the S. eridania, specifically a neem-based pesticide that can result in smaller and prolonged development. The wingspan is 33–38 mm. Adults are on wing year-round. The larvae feed on various weeds but prefer Amaranthus species and Phytolacca americana.

Geographic range

The S. eridania is found in North America (the southern US states as far west as Kansas and New Mexico), through the Caribbean and Central America into South America (through Brazil to Argentina). It has been introduced Nigeria and Cameroon.[1]

Food resources

Host plants

The plants that the armyworm feeds on include a wide range of important vegetables, fruits, and crops. The vegetables include beet, cabbage, carrot, collard, cowpea, eggplant, okra, pepper, potato, sweet potato, tomato, and watermelon. Other crops damaged include avocado, citrus, peanut, sunflower, velvet bean, tobacco and various flowers. Grasses are rarely eaten. One of the more preferred host plants is the lima bean, probably due to contact of cyanogenic glycoside linamarin. The lima bean is known to contain up to 31 ppm cyanide in some varieties.[2]

Glucosinolates

Glucosinolates are feeding deterrents and are toxic to non-adapted herbivores. With higher glucosinolate concentrations, there is reduced feeding by S. eridania on B. juncea, a host plant. There is relative unresponsiveness of S. eridania to variation in myrosinase activity. This suggests that glucosinolates may have originated as defenses against generalist herbivores. Insects selectively adapting to glucosinolates may have selected for stronger defense produced by their rapid hydrolysis by myrosinase.[3]

Environmental impact

Larvae are defoliators and feed gregariously while young, often skeletonizing leaves. As they mature they become solitary, and also bore readily into fruit, often damaging tomatoes in Florida. It can result in significant yield losses if uncontrolled.[4] When stressed by a lack of food they will eat the apical portions of branches, bore into stem tissue, and attack tubers near the surface of the soil.

Insecticides

Neem-based insecticide

A lot of research has been done on neem-based insecticides. There has been growing interest in the agricultural sector in using plant and botanical insecticides as alternatives to restore a biologically base equilibrium in insect populations. Neem has been shown to be a feeding deterrent for insects. The primary active ingredient in neem is azadirachtin, a steroid-like tetranortriterpenoid, that exhibits a wide range of bioactivity to hundreds of phytophagous insect species from different orders. There has been shown evidence that neem based products interfere with the regulation of feeding and metabolism as well as with anatomy and function of midgut tissues.[5] Neem-based formulations of pesticides reduced the amount of food ingest by S. eridania larvae. The growth that is disrupted by neem is determined not only by feeding inhibition but also by digestibility, as the S. eridania larvae showed reduced efficiency in converting ingested food. These setbacks in growth and food ingestion and digestion extend the development time of larvae. Neem-based pesticides are exceptional in having broad range of bioactivity against herbivores that include toxicity, growth regulation, repellency, feeding deterrency, and disruption of metamorphosis.

Pure neem oil has been found to be the most effective antifeedants by the third instar. Pure neem oil and azatrol are most effective feeding deterrent for the second and fourth instars of southern armyworm. Although these products worked in laboratory experiences, it was found that the magnitude of the negative effect on the larval mortality and pupal ecdysis varied considerably among neem-derived insecticides tested.[6]

GMO soybean plants

Research has also been done with the genetically modified soybean plant. They are created with insect resistance genes from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt-plants) and increasingly being cultivated around the world.[7] Research has shown that the Bt soybean does not affect pest foliage consumption but does reduce larval duration by around two days.

Field corn

Larvae fed on fresh ear of field corn that expressed the Bt proteins (Cry1F and Cry1F + Cry1A.105 + Cry2Ab2), showed a 100% mortality rate. Bt is found all over the world and they produce a protein crystal that is toxic to insects. It is also safer than synthetic pesticides, and is also selective towards specific insects. S. eridania larvae survived less than two days after consuming Bt corncobs, while larvae reared on non-Bt corn cobs showed higher larval development than other species in Lepidoptera family. They ended up having poor development when fed on maize leaves.

Soybean cultivars

In the cerrado region of Brazil, the S. eridania has high capacity of defoliation and high population densities. It is an important pest of soybean, causing damage and economic losses. The cultivar of monsoy 8757 had the most significant impact on the development of S. eridania. There is an increase in duration of larval, pupal and total cycle, and a reduction in pupal mass. The consequences may be favorable to the producer since the extension of the duration of the life cycle can reduce the number of generations that cycle in the field, and decrease the number of pests in the field.[8]

Plant phenols

Two classes of phenols were analyzed for their effect on the southern armyworm. Rutin and quercetin were found to cause some mortality. The larvae died about 2–4 days after the onset of trials. Rutin also reduced growth rates by decreasing the consumption and digestion efficiency of the larvae. Salicortin, a gut toxin, caused numerous lesions in the gut of larvae, and were large and abundant in every section. However, these results do show that toxicity is not an inherent trait of even a narrowly defined class of phytochemicals, as minor structural changes within the compound masked reactive sites, which changes solubility and susceptibility of the chemical.[9]

Life history

Life cycle

The number of generations is estimated at four each year in Florida. In northern Florida, moths can be found throughout the year, withstanding several days of freezing weather. S. eridania larvae are found in northern Florida only in the summer months, which is consistent with most other insects. One generation is about 30 to 40 days.

Egg

The shape of the eggs is a flattened sphere. Eggs measure about 0.45 mm in diameter and 0.35 mm in height. The eggs are green initially, turning tan as they age. Eggs are laid in clusters, and covered with scales from the body of the moth. Duration of the egg stage is four to six days.

Eggs

Larvae

The armyworm has six instars as they grow to attain a length of about 35 mm. Larvae are green or blackish green with uniform light brown or reddish brown through the period of development. Each side has a broad yellowish stripe that has a dark spot on the first abdominal segment. Series of dark triangles are usually present dorso-laterally along the length of the body. Larvae are usually found on the lower part of leaves and are more active at night than during the day. The larval stage usually lasts around 14 to 20 days.

Caterpillar

Pupae

Larvae pupate in the ground soil, at a depth of 5 to 10 cm; pupae are mahogany brown and are about 16–18 mm in length and 5-6mm in width; duration of the pupal period is about 11–13 days. Female pupae may have difficulty in transforming into adults.[10] There is also sexual dimorphism between the female and male pupae. The larger size of the female may be attributed to the additional instar. Survival of males from large pupae tends to be shorter than males from small pupae.[11] Larger males and females that emerged from larger pupae tend to survive for shorter periods of time. Fecundity has also been found to be positively correlated with size.

Adults

The adult moth measures about 33 to 38 mm in wing span. The forewings are colored gray and brown. Its wing pattern is highly variable with some with bean-shaped spot near the center of the wing whereas others do not have the spot. The back or hind wings are opalescent white.

Predators

Parasitoid insects associated with southern armyworm caterpillars include:[12][13]

Wasps

Flies

Interactions with humans

Management

The southern armyworm is best controlled with foliar insecticides when larvae are small. Insecticides vary considerably in their toxicity to larvae, which are difficult to control with botanical insecticides. Berger (1920) reported some success at southern armyworm suppression by application of bran bait containing insecticide. However, this is primarily useful for large, mobile larvae that have left the plant and are on the soil surface.

References

  1. ^ Lopez, Katherine (21 May 2018). "New pest identified in West and Central Africa!". International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  2. ^ BRATTSTEN, L. B., SAMUELIAN, J. H., LONG, K. Y., KINCAID, S. A. and EVANS, C. K. (1983), Cyanide as a feeding stimulant for the southern army worm, Spodoptera eridania. Ecological Entomology, 8: 125–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1983.tb00490.x
  3. ^ Li, Qun. Feeding and Growth of S. Eridania On Brassica Juncea with varying glucosinolate concentrations and myrosinase activities. Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences. Moscow, Idaho. Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 26, No.10, 2000.
  4. ^ Philip A. Stansly, Barry C. Kostyk; Insecticidal Control of Southern Armyworm on Staked Tomato in Southwest Florida, 2015, Arthropod Management Tests, Volume 42, Issue 1, 1 January 2017, tsw131, https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsw131
  5. ^ Shannag, Hall. Effects of Neem-based insecticides on consumption and utilization of food in larvae of spodoptera eridania. Journal of Insect Science. 2015.
  6. ^ Hail Shanna, John Capinera, Nawaf Freihat. Use of Neem-based insecticides against Southern Armyworm, Spodoptera eridania. Trends in Entomology. Vol. 9. 2013.
  7. ^ Bortolotto, Orcial Ceolin, Bueno, Adeney de Freitas, Queiroz, Ana Paula de, & Silva, Gabriela Vieira. (2016). Larval development of Spodoptera eridania and Spodoptera frugiperda fed on fresh ear of field corn expressing the Bt proteins (Cry1F and Cry1F + Cry1A.105 + Cry2Ab2). Ciência Rural, 46(11), 1898-1901. Epub August 01, 2016.https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20151461
  8. ^ Favetti, Bruna Magda, Butnariu, Alessandra Regina, & Foerster, Luís Amilton. (2015). Biology and reproductive capacity of Spodoptera eridania (Cramer) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in different soybean cultivars. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 59(2), 89-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2015.03.002
  9. ^ Lindroth, R.L. & Peterson, S.S. Oecologia Effects of plant phenols on performance of southern armyworm larvae. (1988) 75: 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378595
  10. ^ Débora Goulart Montezano, Alexandre Specht, Daniel Ricardo Sosa–Gómez, Vânia Ferreira Roque–Specht, Neiva Monteiro de Barros; Immature Stages of Spodoptera eridania(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Developmental Parameters and Host Plants , Journal of Insect Science, Volume 14, Issue 1, 1 January 2014, 238, https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu100
  11. ^ Specht, A., Montezano, D. G., Sosa-Gómez, D. R., Paula-Moraes, S. V., Roque-Specht, V. F., & Barros, N. M.. (2016). Reproductive potential of Spodoptera eridania (Stoll) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the laboratory: effect of multiple couples and the size. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 76(2), 526-530. Epub March 08, 2016.https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.23114
  12. ^ a b Tingle FC, Ashley TR, Mitchell ER. 1978. Parasites of Spodoptera exigua, S. eridania (Lep.: Noctuidae) and Herpetogramma bipunctalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) collected from Amaranthus hybridus in field corn. Entomophaga 23: 343-347.
  13. ^ Capinera, John L. (2017). "Featured Creatures: common name: southern armyworm scientific name: Spodoptera eridania (Stoll) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". University of Florida. Retrieved 2018-09-15.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Spodoptera eridania: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

Spodoptera eridania (southern armyworm) is a moth that is known to be a pest. They are one of the most important defoliators in the tropical and subtropical regions of the western hemisphere that feed heavily on plants while they are young, often resulting in skeleton leaves on their food plants. They are also heavy feeders on tomato in Florida. There is a lot of development in producing pesticides against the S. eridania, specifically a neem-based pesticide that can result in smaller and prolonged development. The wingspan is 33–38 mm. Adults are on wing year-round. The larvae feed on various weeds but prefer Amaranthus species and Phytolacca americana.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN